Ancient Egypt Knew No Pharaohs

If you think that history is all about the past …  you’d better think again.

If you think the stories the Hebrew Bible had told about ancient Egypt were true … you’d better think once again.

And if you believe that ancient Egypt was ruled by pharaohs … then you’d better read the next lines

Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

Egypt knew no Pharaohs cover art-15-3-blurred bakground-1-resized

Ancient Egypt knew no Pharaohs


The title might sound a bit strange and perplexing, but in my book (published on Kindle) I’ve elaborated on the historical reasons why the rulers of ancient Egypt were called kings and not Pharaohs.

And yes, the whole story of Egypt ever being ruled by so called Pharaohs is nothing but a pure myth and a blatant deception. As a matter of fact the notorious story of Moses and Pharaoh never happened in ancient Egypt in the first place.

My research combined with a body of serious and academic investigations, and supported by evidence -based findings will expose a staggering two-thousand-year deception.

“Kings or pharaohs, what difference does it make?” some might argue. Well, it would make a world of difference if we discovered that for thousands of years we’ve been living a myth, another twisted/misinterpreted Jewish tale that we continue to cling to and hold dear as the only irrefutable truth till this very day. It would make a difference to discover that in a few centuries after the demise of the ancient world we had regrettably renounced its wisdom and mysticism and instead embraced falsehood and dogma.

It would make a world of difference if we knew that what took place at that remote time in the ancient Near East has shaped, over the long centuries and through our willful ignorance, the way we live today with all this web of political, ethnic and religious conflict and intolerance (continue reading)

Download a copy of Dr. Ashraf Ezzat book (Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites)


80 thoughts on “Ancient Egypt Knew No Pharaohs

  1. I have just been reading your interesting article about Beit Bos being the original Jerusalem, which seems to be very convincing. I just thought I would mention one thing. As a choirboy I had to sing the Psalms twice a day every Sunday (in the beautiful translation by Miles Coverdale). They have a lot of descriptions of the wildlife and countryside around Jerusalem, from which it is obvious that it was in a very mountainous area. It refers to high hills and low hills, mountain goats, lions and rock hyraxes. It also refers a lot to live volcanoes in the area. Also it seems to refer to streams coming down from the mountains to provide irrigation for grass lands. This all fits in with its location in Yemen and not in Palestine.

    Liked by 2 people

      No one would notice this (mountainous) geography of Jerusalem – that hardly fits into the landscape of Palestine- better that a choirboy who sang the Psalms hundreds of times in his young age. But this would not apply to all choirboys, but only those open-minded who enjoy some critical thinking. Thank you.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi Ashraf Ezzat.
    So when do you think Moses and Pharaoh actually live? Or is Moses a real character? I’m just wondering when did Moses live. If you have any detection on it please share with us. 🙂


    1. Moses is a Fiction mythos characters from the Iron age late really based off the jews need for leaders and redeemer and their rebellioin against real egypt and this is echoed and paralleled in the books of the so called prophets like Isaiah, Jeremeiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Amos, so on and in the books of Kings and chronicles.

      Its Fiction mythos and fantasy. Truth is that and always was and is.


  3. Pharaoh is a Phrygian word, how can you mention Egypt and NOT mention that the Phrygians taught them everything they knew? All those old records have been re-written repeatedly, many destroyed. It’s a lot of speculation; but to totally not mention the Phrygians; what a shame.


    1. Phrygians are tribe of thracians. And Thracians was the ancient egyptians. Palestine mean Balestan – come from Bal (jewish Baal) – the Sun God, and Stan (mean camp) – The Camp of Bal. Thracians were (Are) Aryans – ie – the white people. Krishna (from the dravidian tribe Yadava) made war against Indra and Aryans in India (IND-Ra — India, Ind river etc.), greeks, although (former) aryans got side of Krishna, Yavana (the “father of the greeks… greeks went with the hebrews all the way. Then Krishna fail and all semitic folks went south-west.


      1. Actually it is Semitic word meaning ‘big house’. It stems from the phoenician and Canaanite Cognate word ‘parahu’ meaning ‘great one’.

        Who is “Yavana” who ever he is hes not father of greeks the Greekspreexist him and are all different to him.

        Greekws nad Dravidians and Aryans are all friends. What are you talking about.


  4. I have not read your book yet! But i will; your post was interesting and very informative.(Egypt Knew No Pharaohs or Israelite). I’m a Christian, and starting to see that a lot that i have been told is not true.This has cause some problems in my home and church; but i’m glad that i’m finding the truth.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Me too I’m discovering more & more but I haven’t even scratched the surface yet. It requires so much reading etc it’s so deep that frankly it scares me being Catholic means I fear everything I’ve been brought up to believe in could all be a load of lies. I hope not


      1. Just the old Testament, written in 300 bc. Is the problem. The New Testament is fine for a Catholic. It seems that in 300 bc all you had to do was recycle much older stories and pass them off as your own historical history. The Jews (arabs) of Yemen and there history , written by them as the word of god is the oldest scam of written history of mankind.


    2. Keep searching the Truth is there and it never lies unlike many in your group who deny it on online here and Lie their hearts out and back. The Truth is way way Broader than that and extends far beyond than you think. The same is true with Joshua stories mythos of the Jews/hebrews, and Genesis jewish/hebrew mythos stories, and Judges and many bits in the books of Samuel are hebrew or jewish mythos that are Fictional. I will let you find that out friend.


  5. Dear Dr Ezzat, I have just finished reading your book and want to thank you for a well written book, understandable to a layperson and a scientific appeal, not emotional. It is important that people who seek the truth about this matter do not bring in emotions and degrade others in exposing truth, for then it is hard to reach a wider audience. You have done this well, in writing objectively.

    I am a Christian and have been on a journey of discovery for many years now, trying to make sense of this world and what I have been taught all my life. The greatest challenge for me has been to reconcile the violent Old Testament of my Bible with the teachings of the New Testament. I have had to learn that most all I have been taught has been either outright lies or a twisting of the truth. Eventually I came to understand that truth is sacrificed for the sake of politics and money.

    Within the Christian community I have not found many people willing to truly examine the truth without bias and in this journey have found greater understanding to read what people outside my own culture and belief system say, which is really ironic. I am sure all truth seekers find this out.

    I have also come to see that there have been a lot of slandering of the great civilizations and their belief systems. I do hope that in our lifetime a change will come and people will desire the truth rather than the delusion we have all been living in. In the New Testament it speaks of the whole world drunk and reeling from the delusion of lies. It was true 2000 years ago and it is true today.

    Recently I obtained a copy of the Old Testament that had some of the original Hebrew names in it and Mizraim is the word used, just as you said. My first reaction was just naturally to think Mizraim was the Hebrew word for Egypt. And so I am glad to get your viewpoint which makes absolute sense. There was a lot of camels in the old stories of the patriarchs and I always wondered why Paul said Sinai was in Arabia.

    I am originally from South Africa and now live in New Zealand and in both these countries have seen that the settlers gave the names of their old country (England) to places in the new country. For example, we have a Wellington here probably named after the Wellington in England. In South Africa the part where the British settled had many of the same names that the settlers had in England. So I understand what you said in the book, namely that when people migrate they rename the new places with the old names. It not only happens in Arab culture but obviously in western culture too.

    It is important that people earnestly start speaking the truth and loving truth more than tradition, because lies kill. Our world is suffering because you cannot prosper when your life is built on lies and deception.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you Marym, for your downloading and reading my book. I’d really appreciate it if you wrote me a good review on US Amazon. Positive reviews boost readership. keep your quest for the truth, it is the only way I know will set us all free.


    2. interesting that you all miss the real benefit of the book.
      it just confirms that all religious writings were created by humans for humans.
      thus its all bull, made up some historic facts but mostly based on ancient beliefs and myths & prejudices. religion has only caused division and hatred between humans.
      I rest my case


      1. Unable to find my downloaded copy of your book on Amazon I paid for, or my hard drive. its been five years now, I think? This is why, I prefer written text in an actual book. What can YOU do to help? I searched my hardrive till I am blue in the face! Amazon no help whatso ever! Regards, Don


      2. Religious but not True Holyb Scriptural Texts like Book of The Dead, Book of Gates, Iliad-Theogony, Gita etc.

        They arent religious like bible/torah/quran/tanak etc whatever. They are Facts and History and Theology Spirituality Guide Books as are Herodutus and Pliny the Younger and Elder.

        Blessings 777


  6. Just a word on the chronology here. The German historian and archaeologist Professor Gunnar Heinsohn has done extensive work in the Near East. he has shown, through extensive work, that the chronology of the Near East has been artificially extended, that certain peoples placed centuries apart were contemporaries, and that some entire epochs are pure fiction. Much of this is beyond the scope of this article, but there are some interesting facts that should be pointed out.

    There is no trace of anything “Israelite” or “Jewish” in Palestine before about c. 600 BC. At this point we find the first mention of a “House of David”. At the time, Palestine was ruled by the Medes(though conventional history in the textbooks tells us otherwise…). No city called ‘Jerusalem’ is ever mentioned. The Mede capital was called “Meggido”. In the famous Amarna Letters, which were correspondences between the Egyptian King of the time, and the ruler of Palestine, the ruler of Palestine mentions that he is alarmed as a group of violent people called ‘Habiru’ have suddenly appeared. ‘Habiru’ was known to the be Mede and Persian word for ‘Hebrews’, but as conventional history tells us that Meggido was part of the Hebrew Kingdom of Judea at this time, mainstream historians reject this. Again, the Habiru aka Hebrews first appear in Palestine for the first time ever around 600 BC.

    Heinsohn also shows that the first time we find recognisable ‘Kings of Israel and Judea’ in Palestine is during the period of the Persian Achamenid Empire(c. 550 BC -330 BC). The Achaemenid Empire stretched from parts of modern day Libya and Greece in the west to parts of modern day China and India in the east. As such, the Empire was divided into more than 20 satrapies, with local people appointed as vassal kings, paying tribute to the Persian Great King. Two of these satrapies were called ‘Samaria’ and ‘Yihuda’. The borders are described in detail. They are EXACTLY the same borders of the “Ancient Israelite Kingdoms” of ‘Israel’ and ‘Judea’. Heinsohn conclusively showed that these “Kingdoms” are contemporaneous with the Achaemenid Empire. And the names of the local vassal kings are identical to the names of the Kings of the ‘early divided monarchy’, which the Old testament says ruled between about 900 BC- 600 BC. Only they weren’t Kings of Israel and Judea. They were local vassal kings of the Persian Great Kings. And there is no evidence for the ‘Israelite’ and ‘Judean’ Kings that the Old Testament tells us ruled from c. 600 BC until the time of Alexander the Great.

    In the Old Testament Jehu, the King of a supposedly independent Israel(ie. Samaria) is said to have an overlord. This only makes sense when we realize that he was a vassal king to the Great King of Persia.

    And a note on the Persians. They were known for their brutality, bellicose nature, and theft and desecration of other peoples’ religious and cultural places. Amongst various other things, they razed Egyptian and Babylonian temples to the ground, ate Apis Bulls(animals sacred in the Egyptian religion), looted gold, silver and other valuables whenever they found them, burnt entire cities to the ground, slaughtering the entire population, and enjoyed mutilating captive prisoners. They also made it illegal in various parts of the Persian Empire to worship any god other than their “one true god”, a the creator of the universe, who they called ‘Ahura Mazda’.

    The Persians sworn enemies were the Egyptians, the Babylonians and the Philistines, all of who continuously fought for their independence. However, the Persians had allies within their empire. These tended to include those peoples with a similar outlook to the Persians themselves, monotheistic(the Persians allowed people to worship another god, so long as it was only one, as they would then equate that ‘one god’ with their own one god), a love of gold, silver, and other valuables, and a savage cruelty. These other people too, tended to form Persian attitudes, such as a hatred for the Egyptians and the Philistines

    And wouldn’t you know it? Jewish tradition has nothing but positive things to say about the Persians. Cyrus the Great was apparently a ‘humanitarian’. Brutal Kings like Cambyses and Darius are praised etc. Interestingly the Old testament tells us how Cyrus allowed the Jews to “return to their homeland”
    after “70 years of exile” and “rebuild their temple”. Now, if the Jews first tried to invade Palestine c. 610 BC, and Cyrus formed these two Hebrew satrapies in 540 BC, then the “exile” is simply the local rulers repelling invaders. In addition, while remains of the so-called “second” temple have been found, there is not race of the “original Temple of Solomon” in Palestine. and ‘Jerusalem’ first appears as the name of a city during the Achaemenid era.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It is very interesting what you mentioned. The fact that there is no mention of the Jews in Palestine before 600 BC, and that there is no archeological trace of the so called first temple is indicative of a prior Jewish immigration to Palestine.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. …and Cyrus formed these two Hebrew satrapies in 540 BC….
      The etymology of “satrapies”:
      As of Wikipedia:
      “The word “satrap” originates ultimately (via Ancient Greek and Latin) from Old Persian xšaçapāvan (“protector of the province”), Sanskrit kshatrapam (क्षत्रपम्) or kshtrapa, from xšaça (“realm” or “province”) and pāvan (“protector”). In Greek, the word was rendered as satrápēs (σατράπης)—which later borrowed into Latin as satrapes—from a Western Iranian cognate xšaθrapā(van). In modern Persian the descendant of xšaθrapāvan is shahrbān (شهربان), but the components have undergone semantic shift so the word now means “town keeper” (shahr [شهر] meaning “town” + bān [بان] meaning “keeper”).…….
      ……From Middle English satrape, from Latin satrapēs ‎(“governor”), from Ancient Greek σατράπης ‎(satrápēs), from Old Persian ‎(xšaçapāvā, “protector of the province”)…….”
      Etymology of Satrape in Tamil:
      Tamil: Sathira pathi = province + residing one (governor) = residing governor. There are many Tamil words as “saththiram” – any place big or small, and pathi means one who resides; Thirupathi – a place name in India.
      Example of Chhatrapati : Shivaji Bhonsle (Marathi – 3 April 1680), also known as Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj who wre fighting the Mugal empire.
      Chhatrapati Shivaji: Ruler/protector of the land/country.
      Etymology of Sathiram in Tamil:
      Sathiram = sa + thiram = (sun-lit) great + land = area of land (province); whereas saathiram = saa+ thiram = teach/prophecy/reciting + talent = a field of knowledge, for ex: astrology/astronomy/mathematics etc.
      Pathi = pa +thi = earth/world + have come to = have come to stay; As in Sarasuvathy = (s)arasu + vathi = holy-tree/royal + resident; athipathi = athi + pathi = of all + leader = leadership; sanathipathi – president.
      Pavan = pa + ban = pa + ba + an = earth/world + person(manifested as) + an(suffix) = one who manifested as such (protector/leader/resident).
      It was the Old form of Tamil language those days people all over the world speaking.


  7. Why did you delete my comment? Afraid of the truth? I put it again: you could comment on or refute it rather than deleting it, if you are an educated one.

    Pharo is a Tamil word. par – means see/look (world/ land), and paaro/paari means one who rules. There was a king called “Paari” in ancient Tamil land (India).
    Israel: isa+ ra + el = isa(siva) + sun + god = isa the sun god.
    Islam = isa + lam = isa + light = light of Isa.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I never delete comments on my website, no matter how ignorant and bizarre they are. Your ‘Illuminating comment’ must have been (accidentally) spammed. As for my reply, your remarks left me absolutely speechless (and for the worst reason)

      Liked by 3 people

      1. DR. Ezzat-

        Congratulations on your brilliant and original discoveries. You are a true scholar and truth teller, and you have done good work in helping unweave the web of lies in which we all find ourselves entangled.

        I must disagree, however, with your policy of not deleting spurious or harmful comments. If comments are not coherent and on topic you should quickly delete them. This is the only defense your blog has against the army of Hasbara trolls.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. Could you tell me please: what is the worst reason? Don’t look anything in a closed window. The world, the universe is so huge! All started from one!


      3. Hi sir, please tell me: what the “the worst reason” is.
        do you know the meaning/etymology of your name? I can decode the Tamil out of it. Can I? Only in Tamil you have the meaning.


    2. Pharaoh is an ancient Egyptian word Phaa Ahh, meaning ‘Great House’. Like the House of Windsor in Britian. Ornthe House of Savoy in Italy. Now where would we expect an Egyptian word to come from, Egypt or India? Derrr… You work it out.


      1. Not only, Pharaoh, but Tutankhamun, Akhenaten (Amenhotep), Ankhesenamun. and all the names have meaning only in Tamil.
        Egyptian culture, knowledge, language all were derived from Old Tamil culture, since it was the ancient Tamils peaking people who were living in Egypt..
        Tutankhamun means “Living Image of Amun”. Amman is the goddess of Tamil people now and then.
        amman => amun. am+ an = mother + goddess.
        Amenhotep: amman + ko + thevi = mother + kingly/godly + goddess => a name of amman goddess. Each piece of word has meaning only in Tamil.
        King Tut. His original name, Tutankhaten. What does Tut means? It means “the messenger” in Tamil.
        There are many Tamil names even now as: Kama Thuthan, Rama Thuthan.
        The Thuthan means Ambassador in Tamil. The root word is “thu” – spitting sound from mouth. Thuppu – speak, spit, clue etc.
        Karnak, Pyramid all have Tamil roots in the names. Look at the huge temple in South India. Especially Ankor Wat in Cambodia. No other language has meaning with root words. Karnak = kar + nak = black + tongue => Goddess Kali. pyramid = peru + medu = great + structure.

        “Derrr… You work it out”: I worked it out. Enjoy etymology through Tamil.

        By the way: could you explain: what “Windsor” and “Savoy” means with root words? I can explain it in Tamil if you like.


    3. Your comments are really interesting and make me realize how little I (born and raised in a western country) we know about ancient India, I didn’t know for example that ancient Tamil land is India.
      They are so many things yet to know about the real history of this world and past civilizations, so much to discover or uncover …
      It is both exciting and frustrating, the frustration lies mainly about the lack of information, the deceptions and lies that are perpetuated, and the consequent prejudices …
      Now to come back to :
      Israel: isa+ ra + el = isa(siva) + sun + god = isa the sun god.
      Islam = isa + lam = isa + light = light of Isa.
      Are those words of vocables Tamil and if so can you give us example of Tamil words constructed with same vocables ?


      1. well said dear as: “….It is both exciting and frustrating, the frustration lies mainly about the lack of information, the deceptions and lies that are perpetuated, and the consequent prejudices “


      2. Sory I forgot the word “lam”:
        la: light in Tamil; la + am = light + “ness” (suffix)/being = the light-full, “light-ness” et.
        kalam: ka + lam = spirit/space + light = spirit of/with light => kaalam = time (in Tamil)
        Kalam in Abdul Kalam : the brightness.
        kalam: also means any space that is lit: kalam – ship, kalam = pot; kalam – the cell; kalam – the whole universe.
        kala: the bright spirit.
        nilam: ni + lam = that which is standing at the front + lit = land ( one of the meaning)
        nila: moon.
        ula: the inner lit one => ulakam = the world
        thalam: a place.
        valam: becoming lit => powerful, go around.
        palam: strength; paLam – fruit : both has the “lit” aspect.
        these are just some of the, there are hundreds.
        alla: al (index) + la = the + light.
        al: a + l = the + light => al became to be the “honoring”/ pointing /indexing word => “the”.
        al+ la = the + light.


      1. Dear,
        Dravidian is a coined word by the Sanskrit speaking people and used by the British linguists.
        They call/classified (for their benefit) the south Indian languages as Dravidian, and Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam fall into this category; actually these languages were a dialects of Old Tamil. including Sanskrit itself. The people who were in power divided Sanskrit and the north Indian languages into a separate group. But, Sanskrit and the north Indian languages have Tamil root words and they are using them without knowing the meaning. In the old days about 3000 years ago (Indus Valley Civilization) all over India (the name was not there at that time) , the languages that were spoken are dialects of Old Tamil.
        The names are just the region’s name: for example Punjabi: place name “Punjab”; Marathi – Maharasthira; Benkali – Bankalam etc. And these name itself has proper etymology only in Tamil. Sanskrit was a constructed language from the existing various dialects of the north; Sanskrit was not a spoken language; it means “refined language” – refined from what? the old languages. And, the British came, divided and ruled: Arya, and Dravida. Because they couldn’t put them all into one, because the skin tone was a problem. And “filtered” them out and annexed the one that benefits them. That is the story of Dravidian.
        “Thiram” means land in Tamil; that means the land that is used to stay and cultivate and cherish (Indus Valley Civilization for example), not to move time to time for pasturing. We have five types of “thirams”: land associated with hills and surroundings – “Kurinchi”; the land that is associated with forest and jungles (just after hiily area) – “Mullai”; the land that has lots of field of vegetation, crops is called “Marutham”; the land that is associated with desert – “Paalai”; land that is close to the see – “Neithal”. Ancient Tamil people stationed and cultivated and managed the land.

        Idam: means place in Tamil – place to live permanently. idam also means position, station etc.

        Thiram + idam = thira(m) ida(m) => thirvaida(m) => Dravidam : means the land that was occupied to staying and cherishing. This etymology is only available in Tamil because only the owner knows the exact meaning. Others just use it as a label.
        It was for those who came to the land, rather than those who stayedin the land, it would seem that the people already living in it would be “Thiravida” – Dravida.- “land-staying-people”.

        Yes, according to their classification Tamils are Dravidian.
        Thank you for asking. Keep asking please.


    4. I am sorry AKKAN but your facts on Tamil language are bogus and flawed. Tamil and other Indian languages were never a global language. Indian languages and its cultures are products of external influences. Throughout history, Indians have been invaded and ruled by foreigners such as from white aryans, Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Muslim Persians, etc. Tamil and other Indian languages are filled with borrowed words, not originals. Tamil or any other Indian languages is nowhere as Ancient as Sumerian, Persian or Egyptian languages. Even Sanskrit is filled with ancient Persian words. Same is the case with the Indian national language Hindi, we find tons of borrowed words from Arabic and Persian.
      If you still disagree then look at older written texts of the Sumerians, you will find proof that they are the founders of the Indus Valley civilisation (India).

      It is a simple logic. Dominant cultures influence weaker cultures. There is no evidence that India ever conquered or ruled a foreign nation ever!! In fact Indian has been conquered by stronger nations. The language and culture of stronger nations tend to dominate weaker nations, and this is a historical fact. India was never strong enough, never invaded anyone, so the notion of its language or culture spreading on a global scale is silly myth.

      I am sorry, but I am a sick of people trying to prove that India, a country that never ruled any nation, had somehow influenced world languages. I am so sick of Black folks tying to prove that Egyptians and all great ancient empires were all black Africans. I have nothing against blacks or Indians, but l don’t appreciate falsehood!!!


      1. I read some thats posted on your pages..and synopsis of you book..the info i got frm you master piece i went into debate groups on facebook to debate….n your work is very informational to us that claims Kemet history

        Liked by 2 people

      2. Plan on reading very soon like this weekend i work 3rd shift and off on weekends…i most definitely will read it for sure. Because from what i posted in debate groups it shocked the hell out of those of my peers who claim the hebrew YSRLITE faith…..its some of us who study Kemetic Science who have read it already which makes it a must read.


    1. No. The real name of Moses was Osareph.

      Manetho The History of Egypt

      The Jews of the three centuries following the time of Manetho were naturally keenly interested in his History because of the connexion of their ancestors with Egypt — Abraham, Joseph, and Moses the leader of the Exodus ; and they sought to base their theories of the origin and antiquity of the Jews securely upon the authentic traditions of Egypt. In Manetho indeed they found an unwelcome statement of the descent of the Jews from lepers ; but they were able to identify their ancestors with the Hyksos, and the Exodus with the expulsion of these invaders….
      These he cast into the stone-quarries to the east of the Nile, there to work segregated from the rest of the Egyptians. Among them, Manetho adds, there were some of the learned priests, who had been attacked by leprosy…
      When the men in the stone-quarries had suffered hardships for a considerable time, they begged the king to assign to them as a dwelling-place and a refuge the deserted city of the Shepherds, Auaris, and he consented. According to religious tradition this city was from earliest times dedicated to Typhon. Occupying this city and using the region as a base for revolt, they appointed as their leader one of the priests of Heliopolis called Osarscph, and took an oath of obedience to him in everything. Although he had learned these facts, and had conceived a dread of the future, the king did not, even then, expel from his land those cripples of whose taint he had previously been bidden to purge Egypt, but instead, at their request, he gave them as their city (Manetho savs) the former habitation of the Shepherds, Auaris, as it was called. Here, he adds, they assembled, and selected as their leader a man who had formerly been a priest in Heliopolis. This man (according to Manetho) instructed them not to worship the gods nor to refrain from the animals revered in Egypt, but to sacrifice and devour them all, and to have intercourse Adth none save those of their own confederacy. Then having bound his followers by oath to abide strictly by these laws, he fortified Auaris and waged war against the king. Thereafter, the men from Jerusalem came on, made desolate the cities, burned down the temples, massacred he priests, and, in short, committed every possible kind of lawlessness and savagery. The priest who framed their constitution and their laws was, according to Manetho, a native of Heliopolis, Osarseph by name, after Osiris the god worshipped in Heliopohs: but he changed his name and called himself Moses. Thirteen years later — this being the destined period of his exile — Amenophis, according to Manetho, advanced from Ethiopia with a large army, and joining battle with the Shepherds and the polluted people, he defeated them, killing many, after pursuing them to the frontiers of Syria.


    2. No way way toooo early for that fiction mythos event to said to take “place”. The earliest possible would be 1200 bce 300 plus years later at earliest ever. The event is iron age based though fiction myth. Egypt before and after never fell into decline like the bible fiction myth fantasy book says. Egypt for over thousand years in that range never declined until the persian period conquered them and greeks freed them. Egypt even after its empire vanished still had good power and no loss of population ever. The exodus is Pure Fiction mythos at the least but more its fake a Lie. NO MOSES or JEWS/HEBREWS EVER in Egypt ever until long after the early iron age when they came into existence as a people, but their mythos fiction was still to be Invented.


  8. A paper version of the book should be published before the end of 2016. And yes I’ve followed the news about the so called ‘Avaris find’ … honestly it is quite amusing; Biblical archeologists are carrying on, unabashed, with their distortion of the ancient Near Eastern history and that of Egypt.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. hi there Congrats, Ashraf, my respect and admiration, the story was always in my life so I think I can appreciate the value of your work

    being Spanish speaker, I would like to read or hear (audio book) your work in Spanish, in fact, i am on it , looking for an audiobook in Spanish now

    I would like your opinion on the Khazar theory of the origin of the ashkenzis Jews, surely you’ve been asked more than once.

    Congratulations and best of luck

    Liked by 1 person

      1. I paid for this e book Amazon, but my computer died year ago and now I want to reread this book again,,,, Do you have a paper copy? I really hated reading book on computer…. I like Paper books,,, Help, are you familar with the latest findings in Avaris? regards, don

        Liked by 1 person

  10. Theres no doubt that Mono-theism was stolen off the Armana Kingdom of the 18th Dynasty of Akhenaten (1353–1336 BC) and rewritten in 200 BC by 70 Hebrew scholars In Greek(Rulers of the World) for Alexanders the Greats rulers in Egypt. Every Modern archaeologist in 19th, 20th & 21st century have been saying the same thing; No evidence of Hebrews has ever been found in Egypt ever; the best minds from USA, UK, France, Germany, Israel, Italy searched and searched and still search today…..Israel history is a manufactured myth! No Hebrew written document has ever been found older than 200 BCE and all so called Old testament documents are younger than the 200 BC Greek Hebrew bible written in a conspiracy too create a myth to control the world.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. No they are older not much though only a few hundred years older at most the first biblical or tanak torah texts were composed at 600 bce. Scholars pseudo and even Amateur both know this and shown that as well as genuine as scholars and historians.


  11. I like to see someone who is trying to get people to understand that history is very distorted. That court historian’s have changed everything. Keep up the good work and thank you very much.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Ashraf I left a comment on my youtube video you commented on. I am not sure, if it got through to you. So I repost it here:

    Thank you for your feedback. I must say that there is not much of a theory. What we have here is a mere hypothesis. I presented the evidence that speaks against its current formulation in Part II. I think however that with some modifications it can lead the the origin of the Semitic people and this is worth investigating.
    Regarding your thesis of the total absence of Pharaohs. I actually came across your article earlier while researching the claims of the Badr society. Is there a particular reason, that you do not go in your research beyond Akhenaton forward in time? I would recommend you to do a quick research on Siamun, who was a Pharaoh some 200 years after Akhenaton.
    Best wishes

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The etymology of israel is not this simple. Be mindful, you are showing the English spelling of a Hebrew word. Israel most likely is the combination of the words “misra” and “el”. Misra most likely means rule or dominian over, and the obvious mention of the Canaanite god El. It’s not in any way Egyptian.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. You have a serious complex mate… why not get a life? (quickly, before the Brotherhood and Salafists ordain one for you… then you can request political asylum with your democratic secular Israeli/te neighbours to the east)


    1. Get a life..! why don’t you get realistic and go join the thousands of secular Israelis in their protest against the haredi Jews at Beit Shemesh. they don’t seem better than the salafis, if not worth, afterall the salafis don’t spit on little girls walking down the street wearing a regular school uniform.
      ..And i don’t think you should bother yourself with the paper work needed for political asylum .. for all you have to do is to get back where you came from, before you settled in Palestine.

      Liked by 3 people

  14. “The Brotherhood is counting on the new parliament to have considerable political power to eclipse the military until its handover. In the drafting of the new constitution, the Brotherhood wants to curtail the powers of the president, which were nearly unlimited under Mubarak, and give parliament greater authority.

    The group fears that electing the president before rewriting the constitution will bring a head of state with the same overwhelming power.

    “Will (the president) have the same pharaonic powers as Hosni Mubarak had? How do we guarantee that this doesn’t impact the transition to democracy?” said Wahid Abdel-Meguid, leading member of the Brotherhood-led alliance.

    But Islam Lutfi, a former Brotherhood member whose political party backs the initiatives for an early military exit, said the Brotherhood has no clear plan for ensuring the army steps down.

    “They are scared of the military,” said Lutfi, a founder of the Egyptian Current Party. “They are only hungry for the parliament.”

    so here’s a news report featuring real Egyptian citizens speaking in real Egyptian Arabic, referencing the Pharaohs as a real political phenomenom which reverberates down the ages till late December 2011


    1. In the US we have many organizations supporting color people because they are minority class that could be overtaken or oppressed by the majority white people. In Egypt however, the minority CHRISTIANS are not organized and are given no position of power, yet the majority muslims, who hold all positions of power are afraid of losing control, and are in need of having a solidarity organization as the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD to assure their rights? How sick or paranoid you have to be if you control ALL positions of power, yet you are still afraid from a meek, unarmed MINORITY who have been routinely oppressed for more than thousand years?

      Any rational thinker who assume that inclusivity in EGYPTIAN society must include the MB, must tell me if he is prepared to have the KKK included in our congress if they preach that black Americans are subhuman, and must be segregated from White? Would Germany include the Nazis? Would the Saudis include catholic priests in their Parliement? Oh, I know the Saudis don’t have a Parliement or allow priests in their country, yet they are not pressured to be inclusive!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.