Why are the Pyramids not mentioned in the Bible?

“What if the whole story of the Exodus from Egypt was a fake story, and what if we could prove that it is?”

Exodus Gods and Kings film-5-2

By Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

There wasn’t a time when I did not feel uneasy about the story of the Israelites’ Exodus from Egypt. Actually, being uneasy is an understatement, for I was always irritated by this notorious story of Moses and the Pharaoh of Egypt. Somehow, this Israelite tale couldn’t seem to fit in the history of ancient Egypt or my mind. Unlike most people, I couldn’t take this awful tale for granted.

Whenever we say ‘the Exodus’ everybody unconsciously and instantly recognizes the story as the fleeing of the Israelites headed by Moses from the grip of Egypt’s ruthless Pharaoh. Thanks to the Church, the Synagogue, the Mosque, and of course Hollywood films this Exodus story has sunk deep into the collective subconscious of the masses, so deep that the story of Moses and Pharaoh has turned into an almost unshakable historical truth that everybody believes took place in Ancient Egypt.

But actually nothing in the ‘milieu of that story’ indicates that it happened in Egypt, except maybe the mistaken association between ‘Pharaoh’ and ‘King’ of Egypt, a false correlation that needs to be untangled and cleared out in the collective subconscious.

Likewise, nothing in ancient Egyptian records or its oral tradition say or even allude to the fact that this tale of Moses happened in Egypt. Even more shocking is the fact that the ancient Egyptian records do not refer to the Kings of Egypt as Pharaohs. Yes, Pharaoh was never a title for Egypt’s king. Linking Pharaoh to Ancient Egypt is merely a myth propagated by centuries of falsehood brought about by misleading interpretations of the Bible, mainly the Septuagint Bible (the source of this malicious lie that deceitfully linked ancient Egypt with the Israelite stories)

The only reason we know the story of the Exodus happened in Egypt is that the Bible says so. We keep on believing that is the case because mainstream Egyptologists just went along with the Biblical narrative and absentmindedly designated Egypt’s Kings as Pharaohs. But if we examined the Hebrew text the Bible (currently in our hands) used as a reference we will strangely not find Egypt mentioned in it as the site/land of the Exodus story.

The whole mess/deception took place during translating the Hebrew/Aramaic stories into Greek back in the third century BC. This is when Egypt was first hijacked and forcibly placed in the Hebrew Bible as the theater of the Israelite landmark stories.

Ironically this whole act of duplicity took place on Egyptian soil and specifically at its legendary library of Alexandria. The product was a book of lies about ancient Egypt, called “ the Septuagint Bible” …. The main source of all the ancient Bibles around the world, the Coptic, Armenian, Slavonic, Ethiopian, and of course the Roman.

But what if the Bible as we know it has long been tampered with?

What if the first western translation of the so-called Israelite stories, which came to be known as the Septuagint Bible, was a distorted translation?

What if the Israelite stories we all have been made to believe took place in Egypt simply did not?

What if Egypt was fraudulently introduced in the Bible as the theater of the Israelite stories?

What if the homeland of Judaism and the early Israelites is not Palestine?

What if ancient Egypt never knew any so-called Pharaohs?

What if Abraham, Joseph, and Moses never set foot in Egypt nor even dreamed about it?

What if the whole story of the Exodus from Egypt was fake, and what if we could prove that it is?

Have you ever wondered why are the Egyptian Pyramids and temples not mentioned in the Bible? Do you know that Egypt is mentioned in the Bible around six hundred times? The number is phenomenal and perplexing at the same time, for no one can revisit Egypt that too many times and never refers to one of its ancient icons; the Pyramids.

On the other hand, do you have any idea how many times Israel/Israelites were mentioned in the Egyptian records? Get ready for this surprise; only once. Don’t jump to any hasty conclusions; this is not our evidence that Egypt was not the land of the Exodus; rather this is a prelude to our investigation (as detailed in our book, “Egypt Knew neither Phraoh nor Moses)

We were spoon-fed the idea that the Israelites were kept in bondage for almost 400 years (some say 260 years) in Egypt, and yet all of their stories are devoid of any trace of Egyptian influence. Moreover, and to our amazement, slavery was not a common practice in ancient Egypt in the first place. Unlike the pervasive culture of slavery in the Israelite stories, ancient Egypt never had a public market for trading slaves. And if slavery was not a common practice in ancient Egypt, how did slavery-based stories like that of Joseph and Moses ever take place in ancient Egypt?

Everything about ancient Egyptian culture; its art, architecture, monuments, people, theology, mythology, and the pantheon of gods is uniquely strong and influential even to this very day. After such a long sojourn in the land of the Nile Valley, one would have expected to find some trace of Egyptian cultural influence in the Israelite history and narrative, but that was hardly the case. Though the Israelites only spent around seventy years in the Babylonian Captivity, still that short period was documented by both the Israelites and the Babylonians, and reference to it is also found in the Persian records.

On the other hand, the Hebrew Bible claims the Israelites sojourned in Egypt for hundreds of years and yet we fail to find any extra-biblical documentation or mention either of the Israelite sojourn or their exodus in the Egyptian records, or non-Egyptian for that matter.

There wasn’t even any mention of the Pyramids, one of the wonders of the ancient world, in the Israelite stories. You can’t stay that long in Egypt without taking note of the Pyramids. Most foreign historians and military leaders who came to Egypt from late antiquity onwards like Alexander the Great, Strabo, Diodorus Siculus, and of course Herodotus were keen to mention and document their memories and commentaries about the famous site.

“The eighth king, Chemmis of Memphis, ruled fifty years and constructed the largest of the three pyramids, which are numbered among the seven wonders of the world” Diodorus Siculus (90 – 30 BC), the library of history.

But when it comes to the Israelites their Hebrew Bible is completely silent about not only the Pyramids but also any feature of ancient Egyptian culture or architecture.

Seventy years of captivity in Babylon have left its mark on the Hebrew culture, the Hebrew Talmud, and the Hebrew Bible. Themes from Sumerian and Babylonian mythology like that of the flood, Adam and Eve, and the tree of knowledge can be traced in the Hebrew book. Even parallels could be drawn between the birth legend of King Sargon of Akkad and that of Moses.

The four-hundred-year sojourn in Egypt should have left its mark on the Israelites and their culture, but that is nowhere to be found because they have never been to Egypt. And no, the argument that claims the Israelites refrained from being affected by pagan beliefs and culture can’t be considered valid, for all sorts of Sumerian, Assyrian, and Babylonian (pagan) cultural influences are jammed into their Torah.

The not-so-infrequent comparison between King Akhenaten’s monotheism and that of the Israelites is also invalid in essence for the Jewish cult is tribal, militaristic and lacked (actually forbade) any genuine artistic manifestations while that of Akhenaten was universal in nature (built on ancient Egyptian belief in a supreme God) that was celebrated by works of revolutionary art and architecture. Besides Akhenaten’s Aten was an inclusive deity that embraced all his children and not just one specific tribe of the desert.

No matter how hard you dig into the Israelite stories you will not find any Egyptian influence, not a speck of impact, except maybe the mention of the word Pharaoh. And guess what; Egypt never knew any Pharaohs either (how about that for a hard-hitting revelation).


“Re-examine your old beliefs” to find out how they they have come to define you. Indeed we are limited, if not pre-conditioned, by our old beliefs and stories. As they once carved our past those same old stories keep on shaping how we view the present. Only the critical scrutiny of some of our old beliefs will decide if they will keep their (unwarranted) authority over us in the future.

If you are a truth seeker and would like to unearth the truth that has been blocked for over two thousand years, you will want to read Dr. Ashraf Ezzat’s ebook “Egypt Knew neither Pharaoh nor Moses”.

We have been spoon-fed lies for too long. It is time we weaned off it.

For more on the Arabian origin of the Israelite stories visit Ashraf Ezzat’s YouTube channel.


211 thoughts on “Why are the Pyramids not mentioned in the Bible?

    1. The shrine of Hatshepsut, (the female king) discusses the murders of Hebrew first born in Egypt. Hatshepsut, daughter of Thutmose I is Moses Mother and began her reign in 1526 BCE. Her tomb is in Deir el-Bahari far south of Cairo.


      1. Nonsense, there was no mention of any Hebrews (first, or second-born, for that matter) at any of Queen Hatshepsut’s temples/shrines. This is a wishful speculation by biblical scholars who are trying hard to stick the Exodus into ancient Egyptian history by any means or cost. It is pathetic how distorted your perception and interpretation of the story are. Egypt knew neither Pharaoh nor Moses.


      2. Dang Junior, no need to get defensive. I am not a biblical scholar, just a student of history like yourself. If you continue forward without an open mind you are as useless as a hellfire & brimstone preacher from the Midwest. In stead of picking fights on WordPress why not push to exhume the library at Hawara then we will all have a definitive history that predates Atlas.


      3. Sorry, if I sounded a bit harsh. I wasn’t picking a fight, I was just pissed off by how desperate biblical scholars are willing to go to stick this fairytale into ancient Egypt. Casting Queen Hatshepsut as Pharaoh’s daughter in the story is really laughable. My apologies once again, did not mean to offend you.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Je voulais dire les faits dans la Bible sont certainement faux par rapport à l’Egypte, néanmoins je persiste à croire qu’un monument tel qu’une pyramide en pierre ne peut se maintenir en état aussi longtemps.


  1. I came across this presentation of an alternate narrative; this article is helping to reinforce this. Very interesting. Has anyone else seen Two Gardens and a Snake?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The Bible is the most edited book in the world. Over 600 books removed. How can we trust the editors who’s aim was to control & oppress all peoples? Kings removed valuable data. Unacceptable. What if what we were told is all a lie? what if The Gospel of Phillip is actually a trust for all of us?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. nous en sommes actuellement à l’Apocalypse de Jean en octobre 2023 il nous mène à la lutte de Michel contre le dragon, mais également à la femme de l’Apocalypse, le 13 octobre 2023, nous verront dans le ciel, la constellation de la vierge le soleil l’entoure, Spica les douze étoiles sont sur sa tête et la lune est sous ses pieds, mars est également présent, qu’elle conclusion, les gnostiques disent qu’il y a une sphère qui vampirisent l’être humain de son éther le plus pure, actuellement il y a une purification au niveau du Logos, toutes entités qui ne peut supporter les rayonnements sera projeter sur la terre, c’est-à-dire le Dragon et ses anges.


      1. the knowing that there have been tamperings with texts must give pause to any final conclusions. Not wise to trust any systems here. We continue to discover as we continue to dig. Ongoing.


  3. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. This article makes several logical fallacies, which, unfortunately, render it propaganda. I suspect, by the name of the author AND the idea that the bible has been “mistranslated” and “tampered with”, that this is written from a Muslim perspective. It is current Muslim propaganda that any perceived “contradictions” between Islam and the bible are merely because the bible has been “tampered with” (an easily refuted claim.)


    1. History starts when written and archaeological finds are available. History of Hebrews start with Abraham as his history is available in the Bible and Macphela cave where he was buried. As Hebrews do not accept heathens and their Gods, Bible do not mention Pyramids which are the tombs of godly Pharoahs.


      1. “Heathens”… well, that is a truly painful word, and can hardly/remotely describe the sublime theology of Ancient Egypt. Besides, you are pitifully misinformed and have been spoon-fed “false dogma”. To your knowledge, the so called Hebrews were polytheist for centuries. Their monotheism is rather a late invention (we are talking 5th/3 rd. century BC). Read the (shocking) scientific/archeological finds of Prof. Ze’ev Herzog, former head of archeological excavation in Tel Aviv University. http://noahkennedy.net/zeev-herzog-and-the-historicity-of-the-bible/

        Liked by 2 people

    2. The Hebrew bible the Septuagint version was written in 300 B.C.E. 70 Hebrew scholars hired and paid by a Greek General who was then controlling and ruling Pharoah (King) of Egypt (Gopt). The Greek’s couldn’t read Hebrew script and the Scholars were making up fantasy every day! They rewrote Sumerian, Phoenician, Hittite stories as their own! The greatest con job in the history of mankind! As a christian I believe that the Old Testament was NOT written by GOD, nor is it the word of God. I trust ONLY the New Testament, as eye witness; Historians and archaeology confer the story! There is No Sphinx or Pyramids in the Hebrew bible because the Hebrews lived in what is today Yemen!

      Liked by 2 people

    3. One of the Pharos or Kings had all mention of Moses stricken. We see history being rewritten today (Nazi Germany) because it’s offensive or too painful to believe that people would do that to each other. Could be that Egyptians went the route that Germans and many others are going today. Erasing the truth so we don’t have to deal with it. Maybe that’s why there are no mentions of Jews in Egypt. From Egypt’s POV.


    4. Well then educate us. . . refute away! I know what I know. I disagree with you deciding its the Muslims. You are probably a dirty word in a Muslims mouth.


  4. Hi Ashraf, this is another mind-bending essay! I wish more people asked questions like you do!!

    Considering that the Great Pyramid was the most important structure in ancient times (and probably of all time), it certainly begs the question, i.e., why doesn’t it feature more prominently in the Bible? Well, it probably does feature in the Bible, but we just haven’t recognized it as such.

    The Bible does in fact make a big deal out of the so-called “Tower of Babel.” Today, we assume that this was a Mesopotamian ziggurat. However, a closer reading of the Book of Genesis indicates that this was not originally the case. In other words, the first Tower of Babel was the Great Pyramid.

    Note: If the original construction of the Great Pyramid dates to the end of the last Ice Age, then it obviously was far older than the ziggurats of Mesopotamia.

    Scholars have already noted that the first mention of Babel and Shinar in the Bible is associated with the genealogy of Ham (Gen.10:6-10) and the regions of Egypt, North Africa and Arabia. It stands to reason that Babel and Shinar only came to be associated with Mesopotamia at some later time (and as a deliberate reflection/repetition of the topography of Egypt). For example, the later city of Babylon was not devoted to the Egyptian god Ra (of the Great Pyramid), but to a completely different god called Marduk. However, it seems that a king playing the role of Ra, specifically Sargon the Great, also chose to appropriate the role of Marduk for himself, and this served to link these two gods in terms of future role playing, such as by the “Moses-figures” Hammurabi and Akhenaten, Certainly, the Biblical character of Moses embodies aspects of both Marduk and Re. Moses also leads “his people” to Mt. Sinai, which (according to author Ralph Ellis) was originally associated with the Great Pyramid, but later became associated with other locations with future renditions of the drama.

    Note: It is possible that Marduk is related to the Mesopotamian god Sin, who was not originally or exclusively a moon god, but more generally associated with the violent actions of Marduk, which resulted in the creation of the Earth (and perhaps also our moon).

    Like Babel/Babylon, the name Shinar probably also originally referred to the fertile land of the Egyptian Delta and to the region hosting the Great Pyramid. Etymology of the name Shinar is difficult, but does have connotations that relate to fire and the Greek word pyramid, “fire in the middle.” Shinar also has probable etymological links to the god Sin as well as Sinai.

    Another subtle element in the account of the Tower of Babel is the mention of using fired bricks in the place of stone. The ziggurats of Mesopotamia did make use of bricks, whereas the Great Pyramid was made of stones (or at least reconstituted limestone blocks). This is a very subtle allusion being made by the author of Genesis to the archetypal structure in Egypt! The “forced labor” of making of bricks is of course also an element of the Moses story, and whether or not one accepts the attribution by Josephus that these bricks were for the building of pyramids. It is also not necessary to conclude that the people being forced to make bricks (with or without straw) were Jews. The sobriquet of Hebrew simply designated, “one who crossed over.” It is usually assumed that the Hebrews of the Bible had crossed over from Mesopotamia to Egypt, but according to the Bible it was actually only Abraham (and then Jacob) that made that journey. The royal family routinely moved groups of people around. Jews were not ‘special” in that regard! The point is that all those pyramids, temples and other monuments didn’t get built by themselves. People got “oppressed” and some of their descendants may have even become Jews. It’s not something that should be used to gain a political advantage today! It would be like Donald Trump using Mexican immigrants to build his wall and then creating a “chosen people” out of it.

    Note: One purpose of the Old Testament was to divorce Judaism from Egypt (and perhaps also Arabia). However, a hint of that former connection is still preserved for those who were entitled to understand it, i.e., the royal family. This divorce took place during the dynasty of the Ptolemies in Egypt, and at which time the Old Testament began to take shape.

    Building the Tower of Babel is depicted as an act of rebellion (“sin”/Sin) in the Bible. God is described as being threatened by puny earthlings and shuts it down! It is implicitly the building of the brick tower that is condemned, but what about the earlier and more magnificent stone version in Egypt? Is the Bible also suggesting that the Great Pyramid was not fully completed before disaster struck it? That is a reasonable conclusion, and it seems to be confirmed by the practices of later kings/”pharaohs.” For example, Amenemhet III constructed an enormous complex at Dahshur only to abandon it. Imagine the frustration and anger of the workers over the complete vanity and futility of the effort, especially if it was never intended to be used, but only to emulate the setbacks of the “gods.” This is, in fact, not the story of the Jews, but of all of us. Humanity has been subjected to futility in order to experience the thrills and terrors associated with the advancement of intelligent life in the galaxy for ourselves. It has been two steps forward and one step back from the beginning. Our creators could have maintained us “in the garden” indefinitely. But, no, we have been required to learn the hard way. As above, so below!


    1. Mr. Pope,
      Your knowledge is vast yet not without its flaws.
      Linking the Pyramids to the ToB is more than a stretch.
      1. The ToB was destroyed, yet here the pyramids stand today.
      2. Towers are cylindrical, square, or rectangle. Not triangles.
      3. Towers have observation platforms as they were designed for wathcers to be stationed at the top to be able to identify threats from a distance. To take this a step further, there are no corridors to reach the top of the pyramids internally, which shines a bright light in your claim that the Pyramids were intended to be a tower.
      4. The pyramids are made of quarried cut stone, not man made bricks.

      And to say the Pyramid was Mt. Sinia is asinine in my opinion and construes the thought that the ancients were too stupid to know the difference between a built structure and a geological formation.

      Whomever built the Pyramids show extraordinary knowledge of mathematics and engineering precision that astounds modern day structural engineers.

      They were not built by slaves or Egyptian Kings. The forensic archeological evidence suggests the Pyramids are Pre-Deluvial and predate the Egyptian Civilization by thousands of years. The much Newer pyramids built across Egypt that can be attributed to E Kings are crumbling shambles of stacked stone, more of an attempt to copy the Great Ps.

      Zacharia Sitchen goes into great detail using both the original Hebrew text, historical records, and archeological evidence that covers both the Pyramids and the ToB in his books on the Anunnaki. These are excellent books and in my opinion bridge the gaps of the gaping holes contained in the Bible. Holes made more vast by the English translations.

      May my critique of your comment encourage you to expand your thinking.
      Good day Sir.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. What really disgraces our intelligence is the belief in the so called ” Chosen People” myth/deception. As for the relation, your intelligence fails to discern, is a small word called “Egypt” without which the whole of the Israelite (Chosen ) narrative would crumble.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. This is really interesting research!
        I’m reading KJV Bible and will finish by end of year.
        I noticed this mention of Egypt!! So many times…. I’d say to my husband, “Oh, not again! Egypt Egypt Egypt!!!”
        Why? I reckon it’s propaganda. Brainwashing. Totally suspect. Forcing a concept into the readers subconscious..
        I couldn’t believe it when I came across your videos. Somebody else is questioning this story.
        Well done!


    2. I realized the bible was pure fantasy and fiction when i couldn’t get out of the book of genesis without having to decide if god created the world in 5 or 6 days… There was two stories of creation by two different gods… Lol really…

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I am astonished at a blunder that Dr. Ashraf Ezzat makes in this video! At about 7.30 minutes, he claims that the Nile is never mentioned in the Bible. The Nile is mentioned MANY times in Exodus alone, as anyone can google.


    1. The words “Nile”, “Pharaoh” and “Egypt” are all falsely (and maybe deliberately) mistranslated from the original Hebrew/Aramaic version of the OT. As for the Nile River, the name Nile is not explicitly mentioned in any Bible, not even KJV. But the (distorted) western translations (like the English in your case) most often translated the Hebrew YEOR as the Nile (a blatant deception). So in a nutshell, all the western translations, including the English one you are citing from, are fake versions of the so called Hebrew Bible. All your thoughts and convictions about Ancient Egypt had long been tailored by false translations of the Israelite stories. This deception is exposed in details in my book.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Thank you for your reply. But the Jews read the Tanakh in its Hebrew language (completely independent of the Greek Septuagint), and they find “Egypt” and the “Nile” repeatedly occurring (e.g. Exodus 1:1). You stated that the mistakes arose in the Septuagint translations, didn’t you?


      2. Very good, Dr. Ezzat, now you are getting closer. Do you know the origin of the Hebrew word “Yeor”? In Hebrew it means “stream” or “canal.” But a similar word in a language from which the Hebrew is derived describes the body of water as a “pond, pool, or watering place.” The word is not a description of a great river like the Nile. That was pure guess work on the part of the scribes who composed the Old Testament texts.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. פַּרְעֹה is the hebraic root word used in Genesis 41:1 which translated in Greek Φαραω as “Paroh” which is defined as “a title for Egyptian kings”. This is the same hebraic root word used all throughout genesis, exodus and the Torah when speaking about Egypt. Egypt is also not mentioned in the bible because it was called “miṣ·ra·yim”. It is funny, you say Egypt is not mentioned verbatim and you are correct, however most places in the ancient world have not always had the same name as they do now; which is commonplace knowledge as described in most historical literature. The great pyramid of Giza is not mentioned in the bible as pyramid, its mentioned as “pillar” and clearly identified in Isaiah 19:19. The Giza pyramid’s coordinates corroborate this placement between lower and upper Egypt. I pray that you will come to the truth and continue to research all aspects with an open mind and heart.


    1. Isahia 19:19, refers to an Altar and a pillar marker, that is like a small oblesik, that I saw in Egypt in year 1999 around Abu Simbel area. Under no cicumstances does it refer to the gigantic huge pyramids. There is no way Israelities could of lived in any part of ancient Gopt ( Egypt) and not seen or referred to them. 400 years as slaves, are you kidding, were they blind or stupid? Or is it that Miz ra him is in modern day Yemen? Is ra el or Israel as we know it today is three Arabic words combined, I suggest that you study the meaning of each in 3500 BCE and understand Ashra speaks the Truth.


  6. Preachers generally don’t teach much ABOUT the bible. There’s a lot the Bible doesn’t say anything about. It never goes in depth about anything, so it’s merely topical. That’s it.
    Just like mentioning someone may not be specifically that person, but all those that follow him. Say Lot, he m at have had a thousand peopk a bit they’d be counted as being Lot.
    Why didn’t Jesus talk about the Americas, unless it’s the beast to rise up out of the sea, which is possible. As Atlantis is said to suppose to rise up. But the Americas were unheard of and over time did rise up from the ocean as a continent and nations.
    The tower of Babyl was destroyed, but I doubt it reached above 10,000′, which if the atmosphere was the same, a person would need oxygen. Yet we’re told we’ve landed on the moon. So why hasn’t we been destroyed, why wasn’t the space shuttle referenced. Again I’ve never seen us take off not land on the moon, I’ve only heard stories of it.
    Again the Bible doesn’t begin to tell of anything in depth. Everything’s superficial.
    I could elaborate, but you get the picture. There’s symmetry of ideas being conveyed. Which the bible wasn’t out together until the 4th century, which one of the criteria was anybook to go into the n.t. had to cross reference the o.t. Which there’s obvious heretical books than other books that didn’t meet the criteria so weren’t included in the Bible canon. Yet are considered possibly true and called extrabiblical writings. Then in the East. Orthodox, there’s holy tradtion, which passes on things taught orally as St. Paul references in Thessalonians I think, obey us in word and epistle.
    Face it, too many aren’t serious about their faith or their ill equipped.
    But it isn’t easy for a preacher, as different people perceive things differently then some look for ways to exploit the faith.


    1. They are in the Bible: 1 Maccabees 13:28-38 28 He constructed seven pyramids side by side for his father, his mother, and his four brothers. 29 For the pyramids he created a setting of tall columns on which there were carvings. Some of these carvings were of suits of armor and some were of ships. It was a monument to their victories, which travelers from overseas could visit. 30 The tomb which he built in Modein is still there today. AS FOUND IN ORIGINAL KING JAMES….TANAKH….AND TODAY’S CATHOLIC BIBLE.


      1. which are these seven pyramids I have not seen any site in Egypt that has this seven pyramids side by side and most pyramids were built by different dynasties in different periods so even that is innacurate


      2. Wrong, wrong city, wrong country, Johntans tomb has never been found in Egypt or in Cannan. Not even the destroyed remains.


  7. Dear Dr. Ashraf Ezzat.
    I appreciate your thoughts. I have been interested in this part of the history mainly because my father was a minister and I read the Bible as one of my first books. In my view the Exodus story is far from reliable. It may be a mix of two historical events and a lot of folk lore. Much of the information is contradictory.
    In my youth I found the history older than about 1 000 BCE to be mostly literal but at that time I trusted the history told after that date.
    With some surprise I have learnt in recent years that there are no evidence even for king David or king Solomon, that there are more evidence for the kings in Samaria. Jerusalem was probably a very small town then. No monuments and no sign of a big bureaucracy.
    The question comes if king David is only invented or if he is “borrowed” to be used in a wishful thinking.
    I have been told that there was an Egyptian king in the Nile delta named “Duad”. Do you agree or deny this?
    A less known king there is labeled “The Silver Pharaoh” due to his sarcophagus. I.a. Wikipedia claims that he had a son named Sol-Amon. Do you share this opinion?
    Regards Torsten


    1. The so called ‘Silver Pharaoh” was officially titled “Akheperre Setepenamun” or “Psusennes I” in Greek and he was never referred to, in the Egyptian records as “Pharaoh”. Moreover he never had a son called “Sol-Amon”. Even if he had such a son, I wouldn’t go as far and wild as to connect him with King Solomon of the Israelites. The Israelites lived in a faraway land in ancient Arabia and Yemen.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks for your answer. I only recently learned about King Psusennes I, in spite of the fact that his sarcophagus was found before I was born. Can you tell me the name of his predecessor and successor and if more silver sarcophagus are found?


  8. Decode hindu mythology blog by vineet aggarwal for a much detailed vesion of first man woman story with time dilation. Also a host of demons, gods, serpents and other stuff.


  9. Shiva spoke from pillar of fire like to Brahma like the god of Abraham. Abraham and Sarah Brahma and Saraswati. Indian literature is huge and have well structured stories that can rival any modern day fiction.


  10. There was another exodus story. Krishna moved all his people from Mathura to Dwaraka through a mountain route when some alleged greek dude named Kalayavana attacked him. Krishna’s foster mamma’s name is yashoda (yashua ?). Hindus worshipped the golden cow Surabhi and her golden calves kapila cows. I write spin offs of different stories like a hobby and I can certainly see some spin off here ha ha.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Huge Problem is they all are Gentiles not Hebrews or jews like the ones were are reffering to in the middle east. And there’s a different God than the jewish one jehovah or Yahweh. So theres a Falsehood Entirely with what you are Saying in Truth and Reality.


  11. The Egypt of the Old Testament, and New, is not a real place but is symbolic of both serfdom and refuge. Do we even know what name the ‘egyptians’ gave to their country? I am also following an interest in the origin of the seven day week. Could it be more to do with the shelf life of bread rather than the solar system? These subjects are so fascinating


    1. As far as can be read in the Old Testament the Hebrews or Israelites did not have a weekly day of rest before the imprisonment in Babylon. They learned the first Genesis creation story in Babylon. It would have been totally impossible for a people living with a lot of sheeps and other livestock to avoid all work every seventh day. It is fairly obvious that the important monthly day earlier was New Moon and the next but less important was the day of Full Moon. According to the Bible Joshua conquered Jericho on the seventh day. I.e, neither he nor the later writer saw any problem with a war on day seven. If God had strongly advised complete rest on day seven just some years before he would of course have told Joshua to attack Jericho one day earlier.
      Torsten Persson

      Liked by 1 person

    2. The name the ancient Egyptians used for their country was kemmt or Kemmet, meaning the Black Land and referring to the fertile black earth left after the receeding yearly Nile floods bestowing renewed fertile earth in the Nile Valley. Kemmet is thus also symbolic of the first island and hence wave form , or “erection”, thus of original life giving fertility and genesis from out the eternal cosmic ocean of the sky, conceived AS preceding all beging in Theorie mythology. The ancient egyptians associated the sky With Water and saw Osiris as travelling With Horus in the solar barque. This is is my imperfect recollection of it AS an Enthusiast Of ancient Egypt. I’ve sure experts could corroborate and correct this.

      Liked by 1 person

    3. Of course we do !

      SOURCE, United Nation Official “General History of Africa”, availlable online in English. See Volume 2, p. 41 at : http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/general-history-of-africa/volumes/complete-edition/volume-ii-ancient-civilizations-of-africa/

      Old time Egypt was a black country :

      “The Egyptians had only one term to designate themselves : [Hieroglyphs], kmt = The Negroes (literally)”. / “Furthermore, the language offers us another term, [Heroglyphs], kmtjw = the negroes, the black men (literally) = the Egyptians, as opposed to ‘foreigners’ which comes from the same root k’m and which the Egyptians also used to describe themselves as a people as distinguished from all foreign people.


      1. You are Wrong Several Amount of Egyptians were black nothig Like you of Course or modern ghetto person but were civilized and good. Sorry you are Completely different than our Blessed Ancestors of Egypt/Kushu/Kemeta.


      2. You desperately wish the Egyptians were black. My question to that would be, if the ancient Egyptions were black and they built all those splendid structures, why can blacks only build Lagos Nigeria today? Did some aliens come down and suck out the smart part of their brains?


  12. I know why I don’t waste time reading blogs and comments. I just wasted an hour reading them. My question is what evidence would you expect to find 3000+ years after the Exodus? Bones? Clothes? Shoes? Moses’ wooden staff? Perhaps a diary of maps and with running records, dates, times, and years of when they were in the desert. I have not read the entire Exodus story for a while, but I tend to recall horrible conditions. Beyond poverty conditions for the time. It makes sense to me modern day explorers or archaeologists might not find evidence of the Biblical Exodus. Jimmy Hoffa has only been gone 40 years and we have not found evidence of him yet. If we can’t find Hoffa with modern day science what makes anyone think there really should be Exodus evidence??? I contend it is logical there would b no evidence. I mean after 3,000 years should we really find a desert people that had no food, no shelter, no water, and who dealt with 40 years of desert storms and worse…Have you ever used a sand blaster? You remove paint in seconds. A 40 year sand blast seems like that would destroy a lot of evidence you are looking for. I don’t buy we should have evidence of the occasion. Oh by the way. Vultures circled then to….not to mention sand worms, sand mites, fleas, etc…flies maggots etc

    Liked by 2 people

    1. To Nuggets – evasive beating about the desert in sandstorms or using a sand blaster three thousand years refutes none of Dr. Ashraf Ezzat’s multi- layered etymologically, geographically and socio-historically rooted arguments. You sound like you stepped straight out of a Monty Python episode in the desert and obviously have no care to address this evidence.

      Liked by 2 people

  13. Why does the Bible need to mention pyramids? Or why would the Bible mention pyramids? It is my experience that people have more pressing questions than about the pyramids. Questions like: Where did we come from? Why are there two genders? How come we eat and sleep? Why do we love or think? Why are there stars? etc… The Bible answers every important and natural question people have. There is not one reason why the pyramids need to be mentioned in the Bible. The God who created us, and Who knows us best knew there was no reason to mention the pyramids so He stuck to what we need to know, not what may be interesting to know!


    1. Why the Bible needs to mention the Pyramids. Well, simply because your Bible is laden with stories that we are told/made to believe happened in Egypt. Take Egypt out of your Bible and the whole structure of the so called “Judeo-Christian” cult will crumble to the ground (of earthly truth). A divine revelation needs not tell humans facts about biology and cosmology (we have gone so far in that regard on our own) instead, a true revelation should lead us humans to enlightenment, tolerance and unity (the things organized religions have miserably failed to bring about)

      Liked by 1 person

  14. First of all, there are multiple Egyptian influences on early biblical culture. The Ark of the Covenant has its Egyptian antecedents. The Temple was built in an Egyptian style (the way the columns were styled, having a holy of holies, etc.) But more than that, looking at conventional scholarship to find or not find the Exodus is an exercise in futility…because conventional chronology is off by a few hundred years, due to the third intermediate period of Egypt being artificially inflated by having the 21st and 22nd dynasties be sequential instead of overlapping.

    Google “patterns of evidence”. The Exodus itself (and the preceding period of sojourn) actually fits quite well into a 12th dynasty Egypt setting, after the pyramids were built.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The (so called) Ark of the Covenant and the (so called) Temple have absolutely nothing to do with Ancient Egypt. They don’t even have anything to do with (down to earth) history and archeology. However, both have everything to do with brainwashing dogma/fantasy and Ancient Arabian (Bedouin/nomadic) culture. Messing around with Egyptian chronology is the real exercise in futility.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Well, it’s very clear that you’ve made up your mind about that (attempting to fix Egyptian chronology, that is). So be it. Since you’ve given me no reason why you think so, I hope you can understand that I choose to differ with you.

        Liked by 1 person

  15. nice try…but my faith is not shaken…just because Pyramid isn’t mentioned in the Bible…even Mt Everest is not mentioned in the Bible…neither is the Pacific ocean..Thanks for nice information


    1. Youre an idiot theres Lots to the bible where it is Inescapably Wrong.

      I have a question how do you deal with the facts and truth that the Torah is historically, factually, theologically, scientifically, and philosophically wrong huh ?

      Like for example this is the timeline of events in the bible or Hebrew mythology :

      3800 bce: Yahweh comes into existence then begins to create the world and angels hence Genesis 1.1

      3761 bce : Yahweh finishes his creation and makes Adam and eve on the 6th and 7th days and rests

      3751 bce: Adam and Eve eat fruit and fall from grace

      3700 bce: Cain and Abel born

      3670 bce: Cain kills Abel and is cursed by Yahweh and then starts to have descendents like Adam

      3100 bce: Enoch the 7th from Adam the first human in existence ever in biblical/Jewish mythology is born

      2990 bce: Methuselah is born and named that as a prophecy of the flood to come by Enoch.

      2831 bce: Adam the first human dies

      2800 bce: Enoch is raptured up by Yahweh

      2750 bce: Noah is born

      2250 – 2247 bce:
      Japheth born
      Shem born when Noah was 502 as you know
      Ham born

      2150 bce : Methuselah dies and the flood happens then ends less than a year later

      2100 bce: Repopulation of the earth by Shem Ham and Japheth

      2050 bce: nations in the way the fake Hebrew way says begin to grow

      1850 bce: Abraham born

      1840 bce: Sarah born

      1800 bce: Tower of Babel dispersion takes place and all come from the east spread all over to Middle East, Arabia, Africa, Europe etc.

      1792 bce: Noah the flood survivor dies when Abraham was 58 years old

      1750 bce: Isaac born

      1690 bce: Jacob born

      1675 bce: Abraham dies when Isaac is 75 years old and Jacob is 15 years old

      1648 bce: Shem son of Noah dies when Jacob and Esau are 50 years old

      1600 bce Joseph born

      1550 bce: All die and Israelites multiply in mizraim and and are enslaved

      1400 bce: Moses born

      1320 bce: Exodus to Canaan and Sinai mt

      1280 bce: Joshua and conquest of Canaan

      1200-1100 bce: Judges of Israel and Canaan Samson included

      1000 bce: Samuel and Saul as King

      980 bce: David as King

      950 bce: Solomon as King and builds yahwehs temple in Jerusalem

      800 bce: Elijah prophet of Yahweh and prophets of Baal compete (Did you know that Yahweh and Baal are God Brothers outside the bible in the real world and Asherah sister and wife to Yahweh)

      700bce: Sennacherib attacks Jerusalem

      600 bce: Nebuchadnezzar attacks and destroys Jerusalem and takes all Jews into exile to Babylon which is true and historically accurate and not a lie like Genesis and exodus.

      530 bce: Persian Cyrus releases the Jews and they all go back to Jerusalem with his and xerses and Darius help with the second temple to be built.

      340 bce: Alexander the Great conquers Israel and hellenizes it and makes it Godly and has it worship the real Gods the Creators and sets up and sacred statue idol of Zeus in Yahweh fake temple to holize it yet the Jews hate that.

      200 bce: Macabean revolt and Daniels book being written and Enoch being made up as a fictional novel with the Nephilim lie crap when in truth it was just regular sethites marrying and sexing cainites.

      100 bce: Rome with Caesar and Pompeii

      70 ad: Destruction of the second temple

      Now let’s look at the Real God/s Created Blessed world. I will just start at the same timeline little but backwards

      70 ad: 2nd temple destroyed

      33 ad: Jesus crucified

      4 bce: Jesus born

      100 bce: Caesar rules Rome and takes over Israel Canaan and Mesopotamia and northern Arabia

      200 bce: Hannibal barka fights Rome from Carthage

      330 bce: Alexander dies in Babylon and taken to Egypt to be buried amount the real Godly Preadamite human pharaohs

      480 bce: Battle of Thermopylae and Sparta with Athens against Persia

      586 bce: Nebuchadnezzar is at top of his King hood

      607 bce: Nabopolassar his father rules as King.

      701 bce: Sennacherib attacked and destroys Jerusalem and Babylon for considered betrayal

      800 bce: Romulus and Remus found Rome.

      900 bce: Arabs fight Canaanites Israel finally is existent contrary to the lies of their myths and bible same which makes stuff up

      1170 bce: Egypt empire falls with Ramses death

      1250 bce: Troy battle with Greeks and Trojan Turks and Hittites take place

      1400 bce: Thutmosis the 3rd reconquers Canaan and kadesh no Hebrews ever just Canaanites whom the Jews or Israelites in Truth spawn from.

      1600 bce: Hittities destroy and sack Babylon and northern Canaan

      1792 bce: Hammurabi rules real babil or babili aka Babylon which in turn refutes the bible with its true origins and history

      1900 bce: Amorites invade Mesopotamia

      2000 bce: Kings of Ur are reestablished

      2100 bce: Middle Kingdom of Egypt begins

      2200 bce: Old kingdom ends,
      Naram sin and Rimush die as kings of Akkad

      2334 bce: Sargon the Great and founder of Akkad and earliest known empire builder begins his rule.

      2450 bce: Scorpion kings of late early Egypt rule Kushu/Nubia and Lower Egypt and Canaanite kings setup major temple cults to Baal and Asherah and some Canaanite deities that will eventually spawned the God Yahweh who’s really a no god.

      2500 bce: King Minos of Greece and Crete dies

      2600 bce: Queen puabi of Sumer and Ur rules and is loved by nannar Sin the Moon Deity.

      2750 bce: Gilgamesh rules Uruk and his tales will soon be told and prehebrew preadamite Sumerian Noah known as utnapishtim or ziusudra was supposed to live at this time thus refuting Noah and all Hebrew myth crap.

      2760 bce: The first pyramids by Khufu and kharfha pharaoh kings build in Egypt and Kushu/Sudan

      2900 bce: Enmerkar and enbaragessi rule in Sumer and submit to the kings of hamazi and Eridu and the jemdet Nasir begins and ends

      3000 bce: Jerusalem founded and dedicated to the first of the Elohim Gods Baal and Asherah and El before Yahweh or yahuwah as you call him before was imagined up. Baal is in fact patron God of Jerusalem like Yahweh in reality so they both once again are Deity Brothers. Also Troy founded too by the Hittites and early Greeks and early Trojans. And cult stands to Lord God Holy Apollo and started there and Greece too.

      3100 bce: Pharaoh Menes rules the United Kingdom of Egypt

      3150 bce: Pharaoh Narmer rules United Egypt and Nubia.

      3300 – 3200 bce: King scorpion and hor aha rule predynastic Egypt from Nubia and upper Egypt Gods like Ra and Atum and Thoth are pleased.

      3500 bce: Early established strong true writing systems arrise in Sumer and Anatolia and earlier in Egypt and Ethiopia

      3800 bce: Ur settled as a city and kings come on the Sumerian scene

      4000 bce: Uruk is founded and ubaid period begins migrations run abroad

      4100 bce: Elam or Persia is started as a city civilization like the city of Susa is founded

      5400 bce: Eridu founded as a city and myth of it begins

      6000 bce: Hattusa founded and cult stands to Gods and rulership of early established Kings take place.

      6500 bce: Nubia aka Kushites or Kushuian people of Kushu modern day Sudan start having Pharaohs and early cities like Annu, Abtu, Memphu, and kings of Ethiopia come up to establish rule in Egypt and Southern Canaan with the natufians.

      10000 bce: Jericho founded as a small settlement and city.

      Etc etc and so on………

      More than enough proof to refute the bible Hebraic mythology. This and much more………..


      1. The way you judge some one else as idiot is baseless because i believe they have to agree with whatever you say and do to have the status of wise man..and Thanks for great information….

        Liked by 1 person

  16. “Do you know that Egypt is mentioned in the Bible around six hundred times?” My remark : Do you know that Allah is mentioned in the Coran around three thousand times? So what does it “prove” ? …. O don’t know.


    1. If “Allah” is really mentioned three thousand times in the Qur’an then that should indicate/prove that “Allah” must be an essential theme in the Islamic history, so essential that its presence could be tangible/discerned by scholars of history and comparative religion. While historians and archeologists have no problem linking ‘Allah’ with ‘Islamic historical finds’, they could hardly make that link between Egypt (with its ancient history and culture) and the biblical stories.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. It proves nothing, One could ask what’s the point of life if there’s no god, the same answer, nothing.


      1. There is a God or Gods Creating us and Lesser Beings like Angels etc. The Fact however is that bible lacks terribly on many many things and is Fiction Cult Propaganda by the jews to spead their cultist Lies to the World to Deceive not change or Free the Exact Oposite the Truth is So wake up.


  17. “Egypt Knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites”. OK, about the Israelites you may discuss (I’ll if will have some time). But deniying the Pharaos, I think it is ridiculous. Sheer ridiculous.


    1. Well, the post has some strong (archeological) points regarding the deities of ancient Syria (not to be confused with Canaan). But, I’m afraid the part about Yahweh, typical of the western school of biblical history and archeology, is shrouded in absolute confusion and misconception.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. Holy cow your posts are AMAZING. You are probably one of the best historians and Egyptianologists out there. The thing I find surprising is that this issue wasn’t discussed earlier. We need more people like you…people who actually questions everything and try to thoroughly analyze things instead of just shrugging and accepting conformist ideologies and stories like most people.

    Bravo, sir.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. The name Moses more than likely is derived from the Egyptian word for “son of“ ie: Tuthmosis or Thoth- Moses (son of Thoth),Rameses or Ra- Moses(son of Ra) & so on. The Ark of the Covenant description resembles Egyptian Arks

    The golden calf that Moses brother Aaron made & the Hebrews worshiped while Moses was up on the mount was obviously an image of the goddess Hathor

    These are a few things that point to the Hebrews sojourn in Egypt.
    I believe the Exodus happened several centuries earlier than indicated in the Bible.
    This is why I think so many simply feel it did not occur. There looking in the right place but looking for evidence in the wrong era. PI Rameses is built on top of Avaris is the former capitol of the Hysko Dynasty & the Hyskos first migrated into the Nile Delta or Goshen if you like.
    You have Northwest-Semitic Names in a List of Egyptian Slaves from the Eighteenth Century B. C.
    See- W. F. Albright
    Journal of the American Oriental Society
    Vol. 74, No. 4 (Oct. – Dec., 1954), pp. 222-233

    I think the Bible like all ancient spiritual documents contain symbolism mixed with historical allusions & anachronisms. The Hindj Vedas point to events that many believe actually occurred. The Troy of Homer’s Illiad existed & Troy was destroyed but if their was an Achilles there or who the warrior that may have inspired Achilles is a question. I feel this is the same for Moses & the Exodus. An event that actually occurred but the accuracy of when & who played a part in these events have been made murky by myth & legend

    Liked by 1 person

    1. To HughCipher,
      Following your line of thinking (cherry picking), I’m really starting to find some damning clues myself . I think Mozart, the famous German music composer, is the real Moses. I mean his name could be broken down to Mozes-Art (which means Moses who headed North to Europe) … And if that’s not strong enough as an evidence, look at his opera “The Magic Flute” where you could see how the main characters were initiated into the Egyptian mystery cult of Isis and Osiris. What a mess (LOL)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Ermmmm, surely Verdi has a better claim for being Moses , at the end of the day who could possibly compose the haunting ”Chorus of the Hebrew Slaves” without First hand experience


    2. The problem is many of those Alleged claims are False like moses. Its possible but that still refutes the moses character and exodus and Hyksos is Gentile Canaanites not hebrew jews. And the hebrews came into being about two centuries after the merneptah stele was composed and top that off with the entire torah and tanak early on is fiction and Mythos of the Iron age propaganda. SO WRONG YOU ARE

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Lmao You’ve said nothing to prove me wrong. We know Moses is an Egyptian word meaning “son of” and that the Egyptian language is older than the Hebrew language. Also the theory that the current time line for the biblical events in Exodus is incorrect and off by several centuries. Pi-Ramases was built over the Hysko city of Avaris so when the Hebrews they built Pi-Ramases I believe they are speaking anachronistically. When you move the events of Exodus back to 1450 BC all the biblical events fall into place. My main point is that this theory sounds highly viable to me….and I’m not alone


      2. Wrong sir wrong it isn’t the facts don’t ever fit like the events and the people and building archaeology etc etc don’t And all show not only that the events are purely fiction of the Iron Age but that they are impossible. You fail to acknowledge that the Hyksos is Gentiles and Pagans not Hebraics And they are real and of antiquity which the Hebrew Jews are not. The date 1450 is impossible and the true date 1200 at Earliest ever cuz it’s biblically Based and the source based. Alvaro’s shows no signs of this and shows all against this so again you are Wrong. You thunk you beLIEve but Truth Slap on the face and head of yours you’re Wrong it isn’t. The facts are that and you have cognitive dissonance and serious serious despair if you have to lie like this ignorantly or willfully you’re still in the Red and in defeat whether you like it or Not. Everything from Egyptian to Canaanite and Real Babylonian/Mesopotamians And arabs etc are all proof against this so weld it is way way way way beyond argument the truth is in your face and You can’t ever deny or you die and Lose in so so so so All Different m
        Ways ever. So there.

        Liked by 1 person

  20. Dear Dr. Ashraf Ezzat, you have been called a true historian and a truth-seeker. I must say that many of the information in your book are well-know to researchers for decades, myself included. However, there is one tiny and critical part of ancient Egypt’s history that seems to be purposefully omitted when writing about this ancient civilization.

    In your professional opinion what was the predominant ethnicity of the ancient Egypt, where they indigenous African (many shades of Black and Brown) as the overwhelming evidence suggests, or were they modern-Day Arabs like yourself (Essential european skin tone), Western and Alpine Europeans (Germans/British/Swedes, etc…), Red people, Aliens, or any other derivations? This question I assure you is not meant to be amusing, but one that carries serious meaning. One cannot accurately tell a story of a people, without identifying who they were.

    Secondly, are you familiar with the invention of the name Egypt? Clearly, as you’ve eloquently written about the many falsifications and lies about the Exodus and Pharaohs, you must be aware also that nowhere in the text of ancient Egypt did the name ‘EGYPT’ ever come up. Was were they called before the invention of the word, EGYPT?

    I would like your opinion on these critical and most vital of issues before I can call you a truth-seeker.

    Thank you. V. Wright.


    1. The Jewish historian Josephus wrote concerning the Israelite slaves in Egypt, “They [the Egyptian taskmasters] set them also to build pyramids.”

      Found an article on a website discussing this subject but I’ve come across other quotes concerning Israelites involved in the work of pyramid building, I’d have to hunt them out though, could take a few days lol. Just because pyramids are not mentioned in the Bible doesn’t mean the Exodus didn’t happen plus the Egyptians where adept at erasing parts of their history they didn’t like and there are plenty of examples of this and there are famous enough episodes that you should be able to find yourself.


      1. For most learned scholars ‘Josephus’ is absolutely not a reliable/credible source if we are to dig for the truth. Still some of his writings/records are extremely valuable in understanding how the ancient history of the Near East had been distorted by the then circle of power. But then we are talking about the Bible, not Jewish (duplicitous) historians. Unless of course you believe that ‘Josephus’ had a role in writing the Bible.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Thanks for replying Dr. E.A., although there’s no reply button for me to reply directly to you.

        Then again most scholars didn’t think Herodotus was a reliable source and he received the title of the father of lies, if I recall correctly over time some of what he stated has been proved correct thus the conclusions I draw about scholarly opinion to be flawed sometimes, in fact the disbelief of such people has been proven incorrect in relation to other information concerning the ancient past I’ve came across. No I don’t believe Josephus had a hand in writing the Bible. Doesn’t Manetho state after the shepherd-kings came another set of people who where sojouners in Egypt, which corresponds to the peaceful sojourn related in the Old Testament. Also many years ago I think I came across information that the Arabs believed the Israelites also built the pyramids, I’d have to verify that but I’m sure a read that in one of the several hundred books I’ve read, so it could take a while.


      3. Plus the context of Exodus is about the Glorious Actions done by God for his people and not about the glory of Egypt thus mentioning pyramids would be irrelevant. The Exodus text is predominantly about God and the people He freed not the greatness of Egyptian architects or how big structures could be built. So it should not be surprising the pyramids are not mentioned in Exodus.


      4. First of all the Khemites did not write their history history is a greek created subject Egypt came out of a oral cultural tradition.


      5. Just because the hebrews make claims doesnt mean it is true. It’s not lack of pyramids, lack of pottery, all evidence to the contrary and Much much much much more. The idea that egyptians took out some of their history doesnt give any credibility to the hebrew mythos fiction because the lost history of egypt like the known history refutes the entire fiction as Fiction see youre wrong Again.


    2. V. Wright,
      I quite agree that many scholars doubt the historicity of the Exodus story, but when it comes to the geography of this notorious tale, all of them remain adamant that Egypt is where the story of Moses and Pharaoh took place. This is exactly where Ashraf Ezzat’s new research/book takes hold as quite novel/innovative. Besides, I haven’t heard of any scholar of Egyptology (be that orthodox or independent) saying that Egypt had NO PHARAOHS. As for the ethnicity of the ancient Egyptians, a somewhat lengthy topic, I will send you my thesis on it in an email. Thank you.


      1. Dr. Ezzat. Thank you for your scholarship on this very intriguing subject. While studying pre-dynastic Egypt I came along Khemitology. You must be familiar with Stephen Mehler and the Anwyan family. All of them state very clearly there were no pharaohs in Egypt. Perhaps your comment was only referring to Egyptologist. Would you care to clarify?


      2. Yes, I’m quite familiar with Stephen Mehler and Hakim’s work. But I’m afraid that Hakim’s thesis on the Israelites and their Exodus from Egypt runs counter to mine. I don’t believe that Egypt knew either Pharaoh or Moses, while Hakim and Mehler do.

        Liked by 1 person

    3. The word “Egypt” or “Aegyptiaca,” as written in Manetho’s history books, was most likely derived from the original word for the Copts, who today still form 10% of the Egyptian population. Egypt was therefore “Land of the Copts.” The word for the location of the Exodus was “Merse” according to Josephus, or “Misr,” in the Quran. Misr is an Akkadian word and the original meaning is a military outpost, where a governing body is established. Over time, even hundreds of years, that location could become a city-state. Today’s Egypt is called Misr in Arabic. The important factor, is not the Hellenized or Romanized name of Egypt, but the evidence, archaeological, linguistic, etc., that takes us to the correct locations. Too many people make the mistake of thrusting their own theories on the texts, and not allowing the texts to speak for themselves. The Quran never names the location of the Exodus as “Egypt.” It was Misr, which could be any military outpost, turned city-state, going back 5,000 years in an Akkadian-speaking world.

      As for the ethnicity of Egyptians, it was a melting pot of various peoples who settled there, particularly around the Delta, and that included Africans, Europeans, and Arabs.


      1. Your information couldn’t be more wrong, and I’m afraid this is the sort of propaganda sold by the same people who sold us the fake Exodus story. I patiently await Dr. Ezzat thesis to read his take on the issue. However, there is ABSOLUTELY no evidence of Europeans in Ancient Egypt, none whatsoever. In fact, the color differentiation is so vivid on those walls of ancient illustrations that–in over 6000 years of ancient Egypt illustration, there is not a single European type–not one.

        Dr. Hawass is guilty of intellectual negligence as many images we know today have been faked and altered on his watch. This deceptive Pseudo intelligentsia from the same people who have been sold nothing but lies about their actual history, which must align sadly with the ‘Master Race’ ideological nonsense. There were only two times in ancient Egypt when the ethnicity changed, the first was with the Hyksos Dynasty, and from imagery, they were more black than European, and the second was after the conquest by the Macedonian Alexander. The Hyksos had similar hair type and facial feature as the indigenous ancient Egyptians, and their dynasty only lasted 100 years, give or take. They erected no edifices of grandness that Egypt is know for, and most importantly, they adopted the traditions and cultures of those they conquered. Something which was repeated by the Macedonia Ptolemy Dynasty and Rome starting around 300 BC…

        Furthermore, the Europeans of today as we know, the blond and blue eye concept of whiteness did not appear anywhere in antiquity, not in entire Arabia, not even in ancient Greece. Please familiarize yourself with ancient Greece potteries–they are quite revealing. I’m European and very proud of my heritage, but what I will not do, out of supremacy ideology is to steal or adopt someone else’s history. I’m an academic, integrity, not racial hubris, is my honor code. Both the modern-day Jews and Europeans have cause irreparable damage to our human history out of plain supremacist ideology. It’s time to stop! Again, I patiently away Dr. Ezzat thesis, I’m certain it is worthy of the wait.

        Thank You. V. Wright.

        Liked by 1 person

    4. Checked that Arab belief, seems they believed the pyramids where a pre-flood construction. Saurid, seems he is equated with Hermes and Enoch.

      Anyway seems the Egyptian literature has a text that refers to the tradition of seven lean years in Egypt but I stress again seeing you ignored it, the Egyptians removed unwanted aspects of their history when it suited them and this is demonstrated several times by modern archaeology and it is no surprise there is no record of slaves successfully bettering there masters, Egyptians rewrote history when it suited them.


      1. Enoch is a Fiction hebrew mytho human of the iron age. Hermes is Real Mighty or Almighty God who help Create and Flood the World and Helps human mortals out even today so you are mistaken partly. Prenoahic flood yes as well as precretion of hebrew mythos yes too

        Liked by 1 person

      2. The Hebrews settled in Goshen. See the book of Genesis chapter 46. That is the land where the River Nile Delta is. It is the most fertile land in Egypt. It is where the Nile ends its journey in Africa and reaches the Mideterian see. The Bible also tells us that they were there for 400 years. They where called Hebrews in Egypt and later were called Israelites and Jews after they returned to Palestine.


    5. Quite a response to my explanation of verifiable terminology! When I was referring to the ethnicity of today’s Egyptians, I was referring to the period after the Macedonians. I was also considering the period after the invasion of the Sea Peoples, whose material culture can be traced to the Adriatic. The Sea Peoples settled all along the eastern Mediterranean coastline of the Near East. Their influence could be felt during the last millennium BCE.

      You seem more interested in proving the racial composition of Egyptians going back, it seems, five thousand years, and are basing it on images found on walls of ancient structures. Of course those images show a more African ethnicity. I am an anthropologist. I do understand the ancient history of the Near East. Hopefully, you will get the answers you are seeking from Dr. Ashraf. A true scholar looks at all the evidence, not bits and pieces, and that evidence is not limited to Egypt.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Your response proves my point. Imagine telling the story of Rome, and starting at the moment of the German Barbarian invasion. This is typical of European narrative driven by supremacy ideology. The Macedonia contributed NOTHING to ancient Egypt–nada! So, why are we in the western hemisphere so focused on them? That answer must be answered by you–to yourself. A scientist follows the evidence no matter where it leads. I will reserve my opinion about Dr. Ashraf after reading his thesis. Western version of history is a long list of lies and distortions propagated by western “academics.” We are now involve in the arduous process of correcting these intellectual fraud–as Dr. Ezzat himself has done with his book. Kudos to him.

        Before you accuse me of what my interest is, perhaps you should learn to follow the evidence. I’ve done so. It works wonders. Ancient Egypt is the contentious topic in human history, because Europeans, Jews, and Arabs work in unison to distort this very vital part of human history. It is the only part of human history that the above mentioned ethnic groups seem to disregard with the abundance and irrefutable amount of material evidence, by using nuanced words. You wrote, “Of course those images show a more African ethnicity,” a nuanced way saying they are not really African without really not saying it. From your argument, I would guess you are of European heritage, and thus, the thought of the most impressive and advanced civilization in human history being of what we know today as “black people” must irks you the wrong way as it did me, and many of us growing who learned these people were “monkeys on trees.”

        I have looked at the evidence thoroughly, and I will debate any academic on open forum who says otherwise. There is no doubt that ancient Egypt was of African origin, and African dominated until the invasion of the Macedonian. Everything we admire and cherish was built by them. The moment you are ready to fully absorb and accept this factual statement, you would adhere to the code of ethics we all swear by to follow the evidence, and not to skew fact to fit a narrative of our world view. The western civilization has recorded incredible achievement in the last 300 years, and would never allow anyone to take that away from us. We shouldn’t try to take away the achievements of others.

        Thank you. V. Wright

        Liked by 2 people

    6. Mr Wright, I have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about.. You are clearly reading something in my words that are not there. You assume I am Eurooean and have some sort of attitude of racial superiority against Egyptisns. This is a very bizarre response. Actually, I am of pure Near Eastern heritage, and agree with you that the distortion of history by the Jewish scribes in Palestine has done irreparable damage and the further distortions by the Byzantine Empire to the religious hustory of the Near East has done even more harm. My research is simply focused on cirrecting that. I have been researching this over twenty years and have written several books on the subject.

      Whatever you are talking about has no relevance to anything I have posted anywhere. Your accusations are seriously unfounded.


    7. The egyptians were a mix of African negroids and Berbers of the Sahara, and Asiatic Arabs from the Levant Natufian and saudi arabian area from the Red Sea. Even some prior to Hittite influence like greeks and Trojans. Ancient Italians and Celtic mix too mainly Egyptian though.


  21. The 10 commandments of Moses bear a striking resemblance to the Egyptian Book of the Dead. So if he was raised as an Egyptian royal, that would be consistent with the narrative.


    1. Moses’ list of ten dos and don’ts are hardly the values Judaism were influenced by. Those dos and don’ts are to be found in almost every theology/faith on earth. Ancient Egypt for instance had 42 of them in the ‘Maat’ code of ethics (thousands of years before the tale of Moses). If we are to talk ‘comparative religion’ we will find the concept of the ‘afterlife’ is at the root of ancient Egyptian beliefs, whereas the Judaic cult and dogma primarily hinged on land grab through genocidal military raids (that do not follow any moral commandments, let alone that of Moses). That’s typical of the violent tribal traditions and culture that gave birth to ‘Judaism’. Form my perspective, the comparison here is STRIKINGLY implausible (LOL)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. moshe brought the “communions” with the commandments.They are in the Essene Good news of peace book 1to 4. And if we followed the communions we would have had Peace on Earth. Besides thats the old covenant and now people are doing miracles in 2016 in the name of Jesus…it takes no proof to be a skeptic.


    1. According to our research/book, there is an uncanny correlation between the Jewish distortion of the history of the Ancient Near East, especially that of Egypt, and the destruction of the legendary Library of Alexandria. We dig deeper into that issue in our book.


  22. It is much to chew and I conclude that reading accounts of writers whose persuasion can cause catastrophic emotion and mental issues to one’s thinking and stability. “Africans” of today are living with myths and for greed and self serving plots. Why such secrecy..it’s evil and atrocious. Thanks Dr Ashraf Ezzat for your research and documenting through your books.


  23. Are you familiar with the research in this documentary? Patterns of Evidence: Exodus
    https://youtu.be/2assFIyLInE It concedes research by the writers of a book & doc called the Bible Unearthed pretty much proved Exodus didn’t occur but here is the rub! This new research strongly states the Exodus happened but it happened earlier than Rameses time which is the period Biblical scribes placed it. This new research points to the strong possibility that the Exodus occurred but not at the time or in the way the mythologized Exodus story in the Bible Indicates.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Dr. Ezzat, while you are correct to question the story of the Exodus from Egypt, you should be aware that the majority of archaeologists already know this. The entire history of the Near East does not match the biblical version of events. The Quran confirms that the Jewish scribes who wrote the narrative, took the stories out of their correct location and chronology. There was an exodus, but it was not from today’s “Egypt.” During the third millennium BCE, there was a civilization in southern Iraq that was connected to the earliest civilizations in Egypt. In fact, ancient Egyptian texts claim that southern Iraq, the lands of the Sumerians, was where their ancestors began. It is not a coincidence that writing commenced at the same time among the Sumerians and Egyptians, since they lived side-by-side.

    As for the Israelites, they were originally Arabian shepherd-Kings who gradually settled in Mesopotamia when drought and rivers dried in the Arabian Peninsula. The stories of the patriarchs are confirmed in the Quran, with a huge difference from the biblical version. The prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) had an Akkadian name, meaning “friend of God.” The Hebrew texts claim that was his name. The Quran places the prophet Yussef (Joseph) in upper Mesopotamia, and the Hebrew texts give him an Akkadian title in an Akkadian world, because the Akkadians were the true Hebrews. The prophet Musa (Moses) had an Akkadian name, and the Quran places him in the territories that include the northern Euphrates and the entire Persian Gulf. If you haven’t seen it in the Quran, then you are not looking at it carefully. Hebrew, like Aramaic, evolved from the original Akkadian. Even the name Adam was an Akkadian name.

    As for Palestinian Jerusalem, it was not Suleiman’s (Solomon’s) Jerusalem. That one existed in Mesopotamia and was destroyed. In the fourteenth century BCE, Palestinian Jerusalem already existed and had strong ties to Egypt. It became the second Jerusalem. The name Jerusalem is actually a Sumerian name made up of two Sumerian words. The Prophet Ibrahim did exist, and was obviously fluent in both Sumerian and Akkadian. The evidence lies in one passage of the Quran. The biblical stories are nonsense, but they were based on true historic events that took place in Mesopotamia. I published a book on the subject in 2004, titled “The Exodus in the Quran,” which places the Exodus in ancient Sumer and pinpoints the exact location of the events. The Arabic translation was published in Syria in 2010. The Quran’s version of the biblical narrative matches perfectly with archaeological discoveries. Unfortunately, no one is looking carefully at the Quran.

    Was there a conspiracy to alter religious history over thousands of years? Absolutely. I wrote about it in detail in my book, “Unveiling the Messiah in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” If you think the stories of the Old Testament were distorted, you should read how far the Byzantine Church went during the third century, to hide the truth about Christianity’s “Jesus,” Was he the Messiah ‘Isa mentioned in the Quran? Not at all. The biblical version was based on a few episodes in the life of the real Messiah ‘Isa, but once again, the Jews of Palestine distorted the truth, and the Roman Empire found it convenient to go along with it. Was the real Messiah ‘Isa born in Palestine? Not at all. I take the reader to the exact location of his birth.



    1. Hi Ms. King,

      Thank you for your valuable comment. Is your first book, “The Exodus in the Quran”, available in an e-book format? Your second one seems to be.



      1. No, the Exodus in the Quran is only available in soft cover. I first published that book in 2004 for a select audience. It was the first volume of a two volume book. The second part was “Unveiling the Messiah in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” I then reprinted the first volume in 2007, and e-books were not an option at the time. By the time I had the second volume printed, I used the present publisher because they were ahead of other publishers in making books available as e-books at an inexpensive price. The Exodus in the Quran is available on Amazon.


    2. Assalaamu ‘Alayki,

      For some reason, I do not see a reply option to your reply to me and thus, I will reply here if you do not mind.

      “No, the Exodus in the Quran is only available in soft cover. I first published that book in 2004 for a select audience. It was the first volume of a two volume book. The second part was “Unveiling the Messiah in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” I then reprinted the first volume in 2007, and e-books were not an option at the time. By the time I had the second volume printed, I used the present publisher because they were ahead of other publishers in making books available as e-books at an inexpensive price. The Exodus in the Quran is available on Amazon.”

      -> Dully noted. To clarify, when you say that you “reprinted the first volume in 2007”, did you make changes to the version of 2004 or was it just a reprint for more copies? On a related note, when I order it on Amazon, I assume I will received the 2007 version?

      Best regards,


      1. When I reprinted the first volume in 2007, the only change was the title of the book. There were changes to the second volume on the Messiah. I added more information that included scholarly studies that were published during the interim period. All the studies kept confirming the conclusions that I had arrived at.


    3. I note:

      “The exodus in the Quran” first printed in 2004 and re-printed in 2007
      “Unveiling the Messiah in the Dead Sea Scrolls” in 2012

      I look forward to reading both.

      Best regards,


      1. It is no surprise that some (not all) Israeli archaeologists still try to squeeze any evidence they find to justify the Exodus out of Egypt in the biblical time frame. Their efforts are no doubt rooted in their desire to justify the creation of their state, based on a mythical biblical narrative. Dayan mentions, for instance, the writings of Ipuwer, who laments the overthrow of Egyptian rulers during a revolution in Egypt, as evidence of an Israelite conquest in the biblical time frame of 1300 BCE. What she doesn’t tell her audience is that Ipuwer’s original text was written about a thousand years earlier, and the one discovered was rewritten in a more modern time frame. Papyrus texts had to be rewritten so as to preserve them over centuries, a common practice among scribes. A revolution did take place in Egypt by foreign conquerors around 2300 BCE, and those were the armies of the Prophet Musa (Moses), who conquered all the lands from the Euphrates to the Nile (promised to the seed of Ibrahim/Abraham). The Israelites were all over the Fertile Crescent and Egypt. They ruled Egypt as pharaohs during the century of Hyksos rule (1650-1550 BCE). They were not slaves in today’s Egypt. When the Egyptians evicted them, they settled in Palestine and are the ancestors of today’s Palestinians. Archaeological discoveries all confirm that the Israelites were part of the Canaanite world for over a thousand years before the biblical time frame. Linguistic studies all confirm this. Dayan and archaeologists like her are living in a dream world, hoping to reshape history to suit their own political agendas. The armies of the second Musa (Moses) re-conquered the same territory, from the Euphrates to the Nile, 1400 years ago, establishing the Caliphate. The majority of Israelites became Muslim, fulfilling biblical prophecies and Hebrew literature.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. That is the worst shit anyone seen yet. First, the plagues dont owe themselves to Egyptian gods the palgues at best are a mockery but a fiction mockery lie by Jews on their egyptian and canaanite neighbors. The palgues are from the True Egyptian Gods on people and false god yahweh in Truth and others the belief in hebraism does absolutely NOTHING ever. So wrong on that too wake up.


      1. The Egyptians and Sumerians influenced one another. In the tombs of third millennium Egyptian kings, archaeologists have unearthed artifacts that were clearly from Sumer. The Egyptian-like burials in the Royal Cemetary of Ur shows that there were cultural contacts. More recently, scholars have concluded that writing among the Sumerians and Egyptians happened simultaneously. One did not precede the other.

        As for the belief that Egyptians had little connection to the rest of the Near East, simply because they practiced their own culture and religion, perhaps you are not aware of the recent genetic analysis published in the scientific journal Nature Communications. Genetic material extracted from 151 mummies excavated at Abu Sir al-Malaq in Middle Egypt shows that ancient Egyptians were closely related to the various populations of the Levant, and shared some DNA with people in contemporary Europe. What the scientists found was remarkable genetic continuity. They also found that unlike the current populations of Egypt and Ethiopia, ancient Egyptians shared very little ancestry with sub-Saharan Africa.

        Archaeologists also concluded that the Hyksos (1650-1550 BCE), who ruled as pharaohs for a century and did not invade Egypt as previously thought (they settled there), were most likely from the Levant and Syria. Once evicted by later rulers, that is where they returned.

        Also, a study published in the American Journal of Human Genetics, in which aDNA was extracted from Middle Bronze Age II Canaanites, revealed that the Canaanites of the Levant and Phoenicia (4580-1750 BCE) were a mixture of regional Neolithic populations and migrants from the east who were related to Chalcolithic Iranians.

        One cannot place the various populations of the Near or Middle East
        into compartments, separating one from the other. One has to look at the genetics, the cultural contacts, the linguistics, and find the thread that connects them. Religious literature like the biblical narrative was clearly distorted, fudged, and fabricated, but tossing it out as irrelevant is like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Within every ancient text there is a kernel of truth. One simply has to find it and connect the dots.


      2. Wrong the bible has no Truth to it ever what you said refutes biblical hebrew mythos as it is aka fiction. Also the fact of the matter is that those people of the east had no relation to the Hebrews and show impossible and non existent relation to the Later Hebrews in the iron age and their mythos fiction. So Im afraid youre Wrong.

        On the other hand of trade yes their were trade from sumer and persia with egypt but the claim of influence is False because that’s stretching the Truth.

        Yes several ancient egyptians were related too Levantine people and saudi arabs but also were berbers of Egypt and Libya and also were sub saharan too. They were a mix of people.

        Plus the people of canaan and levant because it was more fertile than the lands east of egypt like israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and Sinai.

        You have no connecting of dots but False comparissons from ignorance. So no your mistaken on this.


      3. Denials are not evidence. Your research is elementary, and you show no scientific or scholarly evidence. You look at one text and make broad generalizations based on what you want to believe as opposed to what is factual. Arm chair research using Google is not research.


      4. I noticed your Book you seem to like that jesus lie and Exodus shit well im sorry you wasted your time on things that were fake all along. You say that the Byzantine empire was hiding up the jesus character ? How since they worshiping him as their lord and savior how ? Exactly you are a Liar i wanna here this because I you are Falling for deception and youre not an anthropolgist if you spew shit like This.

        You dont know what research is Clearly if you spew crap like this.

        The Laws of Research (Must Always be obeyed to the letter) :

        1) Be thorough in one’s research.

        2) Be unbiased and honest to all degrees and test all and prove.

        3) Be Always discerning, and not wrongly accepting all unjustifiably and uncritically any source that makes incorrect and false statements that are contrary to the truth.

        4) Make sure all sources one researches is true, valid, and has real grounded facts to prove its position whatever it may be.

        5) Look up outside sources that support, confirm, and prove true A with B independently.

        ” Truth always favors actions over words. ” – Wiseman

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Wrong maam youre motives and dishonesty from youre content and even title shows your core desires its like reading a persons movements and Lips so Wrong. Maam and you proved and I did the exact Opposotie i showed you Wrong. You in Truth proved my point of your Ignorance and Self Deception. Sorry but your only pawning yourself here. Google overall is not source but it has some points put in it. I cited good sources not cuz of google cuz of reality so youre wrong again. Reality check and smack on you. Youre not thorough at all.

        Liked by 1 person

      6. Character jesus/yasha whatever is a Fake doesnt matter if he did walk the earth like herod and caesar did he’s still a Fake as he is given in his cult. Gospels Lie as all the New Testament does too. Only godless brainwashed deceived fools would beLIEve that and many do. Wake up don’t go with the crowd.

        Liked by 1 person

      7. That False Analogy you gave about the baby applies to you if you pull in the late Hebrew jews who were non existent at this time. They are Iron age and thus fake from the start so im Afraid you are Wrong.

        Hyksos are gentiles not Jews/Hebrews huge false hood look again.

        Liked by 1 person

      8. Some canaanites were iranian and Anatolian in Origins and Arabian hell what even Egyptian too. They were afroasiatic peoples. The Natufians were living in the Sinai Levant 5000- 10000 bce so no quite the same. But also this shows the Egyptians are Egyptian in Nature and Origin like Pharaoh Narmer and Menes are portrayed as having Black or Dark Brown Afro sub saharan and Berber background.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Dear all I am greatly satisfied by reading your comments. Your passionate responses in the forum proves that TRUTH is still an important entity in our lives. Today’s socio-economic and ‘pseudo’cultural reality of deceit and secrecy has demolished all the natural values in our lives including the desire to learn the truth. Many thanks to all and especially to Dr Ezzat for his wisdom.

      Liked by 2 people

  25. As best I can determine, all mainstream archeologists (including those who are Jewish) agree that there is not a shred of evidence that there were ever any “Israelites” in Egypt during biblical times. In the book of Exodus, Egypt appears to be little more than a backdrop for Moses to perform a series of miracles and feats of magic – at the behest of an angry god. The story has all the ingredients of mythology, and is simply to unbelievable to be anything else.

    All mythology is written according to a formula, which involves using the names of people, places and things (sometimes real, usually fictitious) to symbolize and represent valuable information which is hidden beneath the superficial narrative. This hidden information usually involves scientific principles relating to astronomy, mathematics or other information they wish to keep secret – such as a formula for making gunpowder, etc. In ancient times, then as now, knowledge was power – and warfare was constant. The priestly class kept a nation’s technological knowledge recorded for their own use, but secret from their enemies, by use of a duplicitous writing style to compose mythologies.

    The practice of composing mythology goes back to the very beginnings of recorded history. For example one of the oldest Sumerian gods, named Enki, interacted with people only through his 2-faced “minister” named Isimu. Isimu is a fictitious name the author of the story about Enki uses to describe himself, and the “2-faced” description of Isimu means the composition has 2 different meanings. In other words, the hidden meanings of mythology are not meant to be understood by the common man – indeed, quite the opposite. Since the Book of Exodus is clearly written as mythology, there is no pretense of openly conveying any truthful, factual information. The useful information is cloaked, hidden beneath the superficial narrative of the story. None of the people named in the Book of Exodus are real people and never existed. Their names are used to symbolize something entirely different. I would have to do some research to be sure, but my first impulse is that “Pharaoh” is simply a re-naming of the Egyptian god Thoth – though it will also symbolize other things such as perhaps the Zodiac and precession of the equinoxes, etc.

    Scripture tells us (fictitious) Abraham came from the city of UR, and from that we can know that Abraham is a re-naming of the patron god of UR – whose name in the Akkadian language is “Sin.” The Sinai Peninsula, Mount Sinai, etc. are named after the god Sin. Sin was called “Lord of Wisdom,” same as the Egyptian god Thoth. Thoth had the epithet “Thrice Great” (the word “great” is a metaphor which means “the sun”). The written symbol of the god Sin was a sun on top of a tripod. Clearly Abraham is the god Sin, and Sin is the god Thoth. If followers of Christ are called Christians, then followers of the god Sin would be called “Sinners.” Now, what do “sinners” do? They write mythology – or said another way, they write scripture. The “seed of Abraham” is the seed of Sin, and the seed of Sin is the seed of Thoth. The seed of Abraham are the “Sinners.” The seed of Thoth are also sinners. What I’m explaining here is that the Book of Exodus, like all the rest of the Old Testament, was written by Egyptian sinners called the Priests of On. On was a town located 10 miles northeast of modern Cairo, called by the Greeks Heliopolis, which means “City of the Sun.” The “seed of Abraham”, “Children of Israel”, etc. are fictitious names made up and used by the Priests of On to describe themselves.

    Now, are the pyramids mentioned in the Book of Exodus? Well, the Great Pyramid of Khufu is a mountain of stone, literally a man-made mountain. So the word “mountain” is a nice metaphor to symbolize the great pyramid. Are there any mountains mentioned in Exodus? Mount Sinai immediately comes to mind, and since it is named after the god Sin, this name already creates suspicion of being metaphorical. To take this line of thinking further, we can use a little help:

    (Matthew 17:20) “. . . . I say to you, if you have faith as a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain “move from here to there” and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you ”

    To gain anything useful from this verse, a riddle must be solved: “how do you move a mountain?” Well, that’s pretty easy: you simply re-name it. For example, if you change the name of the Pyramid of Khufu to Mount Sinai, you will have moved it. And if you change the name of Mount Sinai to The Pyramid of Khufu, you will have moved it back. Now, who would be capable of “hiding” the Pyramid of Khufu? The “mustard seeds.” Due to its bright yellow color, mustard is a metaphor which symbolizes the sun. And a “seed” is one of those Priests of On. “Mustard seed” is a metaphor used to symbolize a Priest of On, and “Mount Sinai” could be and probably is the Great Pyramid.

    The Book of Exodus didn’t simply appear as if by magic out of thin air – it had to have been composed and written by a real, living human being. My best guess is that Exodus was actually written by Imhotep, who was the most prominent High Priest of On. Imhotep takes on the name of “Moses,” and interjects himself into the story-line of Exodus while he is writing it. In brief, Exodus is a story about Imhotep (Moses) in opposition against the god Thoth (Pharaoh) – where Imhotep (seems to) ultimately prevail. And if you are the one writing the story, why not make yourself appear to win the contest? Referring again back to Matthew 17:20, if you are a “mustard seed,” nothing for you is impossible.


    1. I opined that Moses is a characterization of Imhotep, which allows the author of the story to enter into his own narrative and play around with Thoth. But everything has 2 meanings. Moses is portrayed as a law-giver, teacher of how to worship the gods, instructor of what to eat, etc. This portrayal is also the description of Osiris. So Exodus may be better understood as a contest between Osiris (Moses) and Thoth (Pharaoh).


      1. its not Osiris and Moses Absolutely Super Different All ways ever and More. Adam and yahweh related to Osiris at best only ever you need to actually relook you got that terribly Wrong. Thoth and Osiris are Almighty True Gods above yahweh and slay him and moses and adam and all the other hebrew mythos fiction characters. Wake up and look again sorry. Just being True to what IS.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Enki’s author is ok, Thoth is quite right…but when talking about Moshe or Abraham, nah!!! they ven never existed. Notice some bias here!!!!


    3. That is a Completely and totally crap new age assertion. First of all not all mythology is agenda alot are not like egyptian and sumerian/babylonian or canaanite or ancient arabian due too the fact that they are Older and had no bias against their neighbors and were sharing unlike the hebrews who were outcasts. The thing is that many of people had time and energy into reality not Fiction Lies to Create into on their wishful thinking.

      Thoth is not moses or the fake pharaoh of the jews like abraham or moses or noah or joseph etc. Osiris is not moses or any but at best Basis for Yahweh adam and jesus or Horus and Set for jesus. So there you go.

      Your entire waste of words just makes a Fool of you. There is no Compromise only UNRESOLVABLE conflict where one side Loses and is a LIE. And the Hebraics on this and all others SCREAM that out for to see they are the DECEIVERS and LIARS they are the ones WHO ARE WRONG AND ALWAYS WERE AND ARE. WAKE UP TRUTH SLAP


      1. Fact: TRUTHANDFACTSREVEALED is a liar. I won’t cite my sources, just like you don’t because that’s how you beLIEve you “win” an argument, am I right? It’s one thing to disagree, it’s another thing to blast insults at people without any references or evidence to back up the bullshit that you push. Where did you gather you’re facts? Or do you just “feel” like everything you disagree with is wrong? In that case, I feel like you are unecessarily and ignorantly offensive in every one of your uncited posts.


      2. You’re an idiot because unlike you i do cite sources and use them in full validity and this giving Truth. So no you know not shot of me do you ?

        Now you cry with the Lies of “uhh because you disagree with my nonsense you can’t attack me and give me what I deserve.whhhhaahhhh” Wrong gunshot wrong again there. Truth slap on your godless lost face and shrill you call a “head” ? . You are a troll and fat loser pussy who can’t take Truth when it’ it in your face! Too bad it’s ever there so learn, live it, and love it.


      3. No you and you alone are the Liar and Fool. I on the other hand am The God Willed Truth Teller. Wake up and Truth slap again. Now snap out of it and change via seek the Light and Truth and you’ll be Free.


    1. Thank you so much Noreen. By the way, you don’t have to have a Kindle to read ebooks, you could download free Kindle reading app to read on your PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or tablet by clicking this Amazon link.


      1. Thanks! It may take hundreds of years to uncover but research such as yours shows that the truth usually can be discovered. Your work obviously has vast implications for how Israel behaves towards Palestinians today which is of course sickening in extreme especially given the support Israel gets from UK and world governments.

        Liked by 1 person

  26. another piece of compelling evidence to add to the growing mountain that already exists to show, amazingly, that the most fundamental truths we have been forced to believe since birth are often mistakes or lies.


  27. Escape from the trials and tribulations of Egypt means escape from the creators commandments, in other words the pursuit of crime in general and a disregard for ones fellow human beings.


  28. So Jewish history has no foundation in the land called Egypt, information I came to a few years ago in old books like Lost Light wherein Eygpt or the mound, mountain is said to mean the material realm
    where the human suffers trials and tribulations in the service of the creator. Is it possible that what we now think of as Eygpt was the first outpost of mankind on this planet? Where did the word Egypt come from? In the series of books by AT Fomenko and company the words Israelite and Jew have entirely different meanings than the commonly thought.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. I’ll read it again, I’ve forgotten as per the mentioned concussion, I hope, this will be the third time. I wouldn’t have asked you to give away the plot for free under normal circumstances. Thankyou for your tolerance. insert smiley

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Jewish history has NO BASIS in egypt not only but in Canaan real Canaan or Babylon real ancient prior to exile like Babel tower or noah flood or Adam eve garden of Eden and Exodus. The people in hebrew mythos fiction arent there either so yes thats the truth learn it, Live it and Love it.


    1. How I wish we could see your work discussed more. Maybe, just maybe, with a little bit of acknowledgement that the “truth” of the Bible needs to be taken with a spoonful of salt, we could have a more rational world.

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.