“That is what everybody saw … or at least what they believe they saw”
Why do we get so much written about 9/11?
It is almost ten years now since the tragic and deadly attacks on the world trade center WTC in New York, and still so many bloggers, writers and political pundits are writing on the subject trying to better understand what happened on 9/11. And no matter how much is written about 9/11 it always seems not enough for them nor for their audience.
This insatiable appetite for any 9/11 related literature is telling us many things. It is a clear sign of uncertainty. It is an eloquent testimony to a lot of people’s dissatisfaction with the official story of 9/11which in fact doesn’t hold water.
It simply tells us that the truth behind 9/11 has not yet been reached.
9/11 attacks are quite unique in so many ways. They are by far the worst terrorist attacks ever to take place on American soil and they are also the first terrorist attacks to be aired live on everybody’s TV screen… And this as painful and shocking to watch as it seemed but on the other hand it left no room for doubt as to how it happened, millions were simultaneously viewing the planes operation as it took place by the minute…and they were in no need of a commentator to describe what they were viewing.
Seeing is believing
Seeing is believing; … the planes hit the towers … then the towers collapsed like a house of cards … that’s what happened … that was the main story, wasn’t it? .. That what everybody saw … or at least what they believed they had seen.
Like the WTC towers the official story of 9/11 has been the target not of terrorism but of the skepticism and criticism of a lot of people who couldn’t buy into the awkwardly lacking logic narrative.
What you see is not necessarily what you get …especially when you’ve been deceived.
Some conspiracy theories tried to figure out what happened and solve the mystery behind 9/11. Most of them tend to believe that the WTC towers went down due to controlled demolition and by utilizing high-tech explosives namely, Nanothermite.
A lot of people inside and outside US denounce the official 9/11 story amongst them are firefighters, writers, engineers, veterans, politicians, chemists and architects. They all are part of multiple and free movements for 9/11 truth.
Technology and truth
9/11 was a live broadcast on almost every news channel all over the world because it happened in the third millennium, the age of high tech media communication
Modern Technology has helped man to discover new findings in life and to settle unanswered questions as well. One of the most debated and amusingly popular questions of the late 19th century was whether or not all four of a horse’s hooves are off the ground at the same time during a gallop. In 1877, Eadweard J. Muybridge – English born photographer- settled this question before the advent of moving pictures with a single photographic negative showing a racehorse airborne in the midst of a gallop. Studying the photographic negative -back then- was like playing a film or a video in slow motion.
The slow motion feature allows the viewers to capture minor details otherwise imperceptible to the naked eye. It also excludes any possible visual anomalies or tricks of light better known as the rods phenomenon.
The 9/11widely known video has recently been examined, enlarged and played in slow motion
In the video there are two shots of the planes colliding into the World Trade Center towers, the second airplane didn’t exactly look like a commercial plane. In both cases, the explosions relating to the planes’ collisions appear to occur prior to the planes’ impact…!
Like the late 19th century debate about the galloping horse which was settled by examining the photographic negative of the photos taken of the racehorse while running in a race the debate of 9/11 official story vs. 9/11 conspiracy theory could be brought into brighter light by reexamining the planes` collisions footage.
The video shows us that we’re still away from the truth behind 9/11 and it clearly demonstrates that sometimes things are not what they seem to be. The official 9/11 story , exactly like the twin towers and building 7, is collapsing not by collisions but due to explosive evidences.
Seeing is believing… only if we have seen it all.